I managed to achieve something similar the other day by creating a
.bash_profile which then got read instead of my .profile that had my MacPorts
path changes. Once I moved the things I wanted from .bash_profile to .profile,
deleted .bash_profile and opened a new terminal window, port was back.
How far back are the MacOS releases supported with binary packages?
I am currently installing SoX on 10.5.8, and it seems each and every
dependency (including apple-gcc42 for some reason) has to be built
form source.
Jan
On Jan 14, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Lenore Horner wrote:
>
> I managed to achieve something similar the other day by creating a
> .bash_profile which then got read instead of my .profile that had my MacPorts
> path changes. Once I moved the things I wanted from
Forwarding to the macports-users list.
First check whether /opt/local/bin actually ends up being in your PATH
by running 'echo $PATH' in your shell.
--- Begin Message ---
I sorry to send this question to you directly but my Macports question
seems not to fit into the unusual cases so I’m not
On Jan 14 10:40:23, jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> PPC or Intel ?
> A buildbot exists for PPC, but not intel
Ah, right, my machine is Intel. Thanks.
Jan
Hi Jan,
Jan Stary wrote:
PPC or Intel ?
A buildbot exists for PPC, but not intel
Ah, right, my machine is Intel. Thanks.
most stuff works fine on 10.5 and I an happy with that OS which is
faster than 10.6 if you have 32bit intel CPUs (if you have 64bit,
indeed, 10.6 is a recommendable
!!! WARNING !!!
The 10.13.2 supplemental update in-activates the root account if enabled
Luckily, on the machines I've updated, I also had a normal admin
account, so no big deal ; but I also have a machine with no normal admin
account, so if it does that on that one also, it'll be a hell of a
I'm having problems with /usr/libexec/path_helper on some of my machines
& I've been completely unable to discover what it is that's going wrong :-(
Now, as part of my install process of MacPorts I'm doing this :
# setup the system paths
('paths')
mkdir -p /etc/paths.d
On Jan 15 02:26:31, macint...@mathiesen.info wrote:
> !!! WARNING !!!
>
> The 10.13.2 supplemental update in-activates the root account if enabled
> Luckily, on the machines I've updated, I also had a normal admin
> account, so no big deal ; but I also have a machine with no normal admin
>