On Feb 13, 2018, at 05:07, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Feb 13 10:08:02, miniu...@free.fr wrote:
>> Are you sure the command line development tools from Xcode are properly
>> installed ?
>>
>> $ xcode-select -p
>
> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer
>
> And indeed, mkdep is not there.
> But
I have the following item on my computer which is running macOS 10.11.6. I have
Mac Ports installed.
/Library/StartupItems/daemonic-dbus
I think this is cruft but I’m wondering if it is part of Mac Ports or if not,
where it came from. X11? I really want to throw it away.
Jerry
Are you sure the command line development tools from Xcode are properly
installed ?
$ xcode-select -p
Le 13.02.2018 à 09:21, Jan Stary a écrit :
> This is 10.13.2 with XCode 9.2
>
> $ mkdep *.c
> mkdep: error: unable to find utility "mkdep", not a developer tool or in PATH
>
> $ which mkdep
>
On Feb 13 10:08:02, miniu...@free.fr wrote:
> Are you sure the command line development tools from Xcode are properly
> installed ?
>
> $ xcode-select -p
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer
And indeed, mkdep is not there.
But what does it matter:
$ which mkdep
/usr/bin/mkdep
$ ls
On Feb 13 06:50:20, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2018, at 05:07, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > On Feb 13 10:08:02, miniu...@free.fr wrote:
> >> Are you sure the command line development tools from Xcode are properly
> >> installed ?
> >>
> >> $ xcode-select -p
> >
> >
This is 10.13.2 with XCode 9.2
$ mkdep *.c
mkdep: error: unable to find utility "mkdep", not a developer tool or in PATH
$ which mkdep
/usr/bin/mkdep
$ echo $PATH
/Users/hans/bin:/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
Am I missing something obvious?
On 13 Feb 2018, at 07:01, Ken Cunningham
wrote:
> If there is anything worth having in MacPorts that is in Homebrew but not
> MacPorts, just ask for it.
I'm trying homebrew as a fallback for MacPorts, but since you said anything,
here's a wish list: cask,
On 12 Feb 2018, at 23:08, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> MacPorts can deny any access to Homebrew during builds in trace mode.
> Less invasive than renaming files or folders.
>> port -t install PORTNAME
Depending on who you ask, there's much overhead, in any case, >%50.
On 13 Feb 2018, at 19:52, Ken Cunningham
wrote:
> 1. cask:
> […]
> I think nobody finds this in general to be all that magical or useful though,
> and so nobody bothers to spend any time on building these sorts of Portfiles.
> You want Adobe Air? Just go to the
On 2018-02-13, at 6:40 AM, db wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2018, at 07:01, Ken Cunningham
> wrote:
>> If there is anything worth having in MacPorts that is in Homebrew but not
>> MacPorts, just ask for it.
>
> I'm trying homebrew as a fallback for MacPorts, but since
10 matches
Mail list logo