Can you explain more what you mean by this?
1) The lack of a gfortran meant that install errors were found using the
restore_ports.tcl script.
I don't think there should be any port which tries to build using an
executable called "gfortran". A port such as gcc49 installs gfortran-mp-4.9.
David
Hi Mojca,
How do you hide a prefix when installing?
David
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Mojca Miklavec <
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 August 2017 at 23:24, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > On Aug 29, 2017, at 07:08, db wrote:
> >
> >> best practice for running macports along with
Hello Chao-Chin,
This is not a bug. Note the text in the port description for
openmpi-default: "THIS SUBPORT WRAPS MACPORTS' DEFAULT COMPILER FOR C/C++
(AND THE FORTRAN COMPILER SELECTED BY THE VARIANT, IF ANY)" So, you have
built OpenMPI for clang for C/C++ and gfortran (from gcc7) for Fortran.
Regarding +x11 vs +quartz, you can use a line like this (from PortGroup
active_variants) to check that dependents (e.g. gtk2) have the right
variant (namely, yes +quartz and not +x11):
require_active_variants gtk2 quartz x11
David
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> On
To install a variant, you would write "port install gpsd +xgps". I believe
the note is saying that after this installation you will now have the xgps
and xgspspeed programs: from this port gpsd, not from some other port.
David
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Dave Horsfall
I suggest a port crane (to fit with our name), e.g.
https://www.tripadvisor.com/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g32810-i36315229-Oakland_California.html
David
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Ken Cunningham <
ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2018-02-21, at 12:36 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure about how to fix your problem, but I believe the root cause is
that you used something very strange as a revision. I suspect you meant to
use "0.97.114.105.102.115.97.104.97.1" as a version not a revision. In our
terminology, revisions mean updates to the packaging in the
ATLAS just always takes a long time to build. It stands for "Automatically
Tuned Linear Algebra System," so all that time is the automatic tuning. If
you want a quicker build, use OpenBLAS or the built-in Accelerate framework.
David
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:21 AM, Joshua Kordani
I believe the "known bugs" in question for use of Accelerate may be fixed
by our current use of the veclibfort port as an intermediate layer between
Fortran and Accelerate.
David
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> I wasn’t able to confirm if that bug
For the record, you can always stop a build by typing CTRL-C, and it will
not corrupt anything. Only at the install stage are any files permanently
changed. If you do "port clean" after stopping the build, you will be right
back where you were before the build.
David
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:13
Sorry, you can't do that either. Only one version of a port may be active
at a time. MacPorts does not in fact record the specific version of the
library used in building a port, and the point is that the absolute path is
generally the same for the files of different versions of a port, so there
You can't specify which version of a port you want to install. You can only
install the current version.
If you really need an older version for some reason, you'll need to dig the
old Portfile out of the repository on GitHub and use that.
David
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Michael
them.
David
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Michael <keybou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2018-03-04, at 10:41 AM, David Strubbe <dstru...@macports.org> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you saying here. MacPorts only ever links against the
> current version of a library. Why
Hello Manav,
ATLAS is LAPACK installed from MacPorts, so what you are asking for is
already available with octave +atlas.
The OpenBLAS port, if installed with +lapack, also provides LAPACK, in
which case it can be used with Octave as "octave +openblas".
David
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:49 AM,
gt;
> On 5 Dec2020, at 6:40 PM, David Strubbe wrote:
>
> Have you tried following the instructions in the link I sent?
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 9:58 AM Murray Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
>> I found macports.macports-ports/devel/bison/Portfile, but I see nowhere
>> to se
Hello Murray,
Please look at this ticket: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/61055. Try the
older bison version as listed.
The other ticket is talking about whether software should be updated in
MacPorts, which is not offering advice aimed at users.
David
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:04 PM Murray
gt;
> How do I find an earlier version?
>
> On 3 Dec2020, at 5:33 PM, David Strubbe wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:24 PM Murray Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
>> Do I need to uninstall the newer versions of bison? or will the build of
>> openscad automatic
after installation, you can re-activate the newer version of
bison.
>
> On 3 Dec2020, at 5:09 PM, David Strubbe wrote:
>
> Hello Murray,
>
> Please look at this ticket: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/61055. Try
> the older bison version as listed.
>
> The other ticket
Hello Jianxin,
Did you try running the testsuite (port test xcrysden) or trying some other
examples?
David
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 4:14 PM Zhu, Jianxin via macports-users <
macports-users@lists.macports.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I recently upgraded my Macbook computer (intel processor) OS
Dear Sarah,
The info at https://guide.macports.org/#installing.macports.uninstalling
only says that uninstalling is a drastic step in the context of trying to
solve some issue with macports (i.e. it could probably solved without
uninstalling). But there is no problem with uninstalling macports
20 matches
Mail list logo