René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Thanks. This doesn't really answer the question if /bin/sh is still bash
> but I suppose there is little chance that has changed since 10.9 .
I am running Sierra 10.12.3.
% /bin/sh --version
GNU bash, version 3.2.57(1)-release
Le 15/02/2018 à 00:42, Michael a écrit :
I think we should look at ways in which MacPorts is harder to use and see if we
can address those.
I'd say that being able to install software without having to use sudo would be
my number one.
So, maybe a --user switch, similar to Python pip's ?
Or,
Le 19/09/2018 à 17:12, Ken Cunningham a écrit :
I haven't dived into Mojave yet, but if all the system libraries in /usr/lib
and all the Frameworks are x86_64 only, then I don't see how that could work,
even if you compiled against an SDK (like the 10.13 SDK) that still has i386
support.
I
Hello,
Forgive me if this is documented and I didn't find out. I just updated
to Ventura, and reinstalled MacPorts (as I always do when I upgrade the
OS).
I notice that everything gets compiled from source.
Is it because there are no Ventura builders, or did I do something wrong ?
Thanks,
Le 29/12/2022 à 01:27, Chris Jones a écrit :
You don’t mention what architecture you are running ?
Builders are now available for x86_64 but not arm64 yet.
https://build.macports.org/waterfall
I see, thanks.
I am running arm64 indeed.
Cheers, and Happy Holidays,
Julien
Le 02/03/2023 à 19:05, Eckard Brauer a écrit :
Maybe.
Contained in ports is MacOSX10.6.sdk, what could be installed even on
10.5 machines, as the port shows. Currently, it seems to have some
problem, but I'd rather try to have a deeper view inside.
My understanding is that the SDK is what
Le 01/03/2023 à 11:14, Eckard Brauer a écrit :
Just set up my Powerbook with a virgin Leopard OS, installed fresh
Macports and tried to compile Vim. That does install all the
dependencies fine, but has errors compiling vim itself:
:info:build In file included from vim.h:283,
:info:build