If you're not wring/changing the array no problems. But to be safe use
Object#freeze...
Terry Moore
On 19/10/2011, at 6:26 PM, Michael Johnston wrote:
> Note, in my example I can also guarantee that none of the elements in b are
> going to be changed (for example, an array of strings)
> Cheer
Note, in my example I can also guarantee that none of the elements in b are
going to be changed (for example, an array of strings)
Cheerio,
Michael Johnston
lastobe...@mac.com
On 2011-10-18, at 10:17 PM, Michael Johnston wrote:
> In ObjC, the immutable collections are threadsafe.
>
> In mac
In ObjC, the immutable collections are threadsafe.
In macruby, are collections threadsafe to read only?
ie, if I do this:
a = [ ...] # an array that may or may not be changed
b = a.dup # nowhere in the code is b ever used to add/delete/change an element
is b thread-safe to read from multiple t
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:04:37 +0200 Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
> Hi Perry,
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Perry E. Metzger
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:44:56 -0700 Matt Aimonetti
> > wrote:
> >> See my earlier reply, basically, you are right, it is technically
> >> possible to chang
Hi Perry,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:44:56 -0700 Matt Aimonetti
> wrote:
>> See my earlier reply, basically, you are right, it is technically
>> possible to change the way MacRuby works to use an automatic
>> reference counting approach.
>>
