David
Yes? I got an impression it's just matz implementation. BTW, do RubyMotion even
run ruby spec?
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:04 AM, david kramf wrote:
> Francis,
> Ruby is very well defined language with a well defined standard.
> David
> On May 17, 2013, at 3
Francis,
Ruby is very well defined language with a well defined standard.
David
On May 17, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Francis Chong wrote:
> @david depends on your definition on full ruby. I would say standard library
> is part is full ruby, where RubyMotion deliberately remove part of them
>
> @stephen
Fair enough Steve, thanks for the reply - I'm still working on figuring out
this MVC thing and keeping the logic of my app separate. I suppose I could
have the code to load the JSON into a hash within the model, but keep the
actual object creation and collection outside. At least then all the
Hi Jeff,
I'm no guru but I wouldn't put the methods for dealing with the collection into
the model class.
You could indeed have a class array (by using the @@prefix for your variable
name) but you could not easily access it in a KVC compliant manner and
therefore could not directly bind it to
