On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:41 AM, Terry Moore wrote:
> If you're not wring/changing the array no problems. But to be safe use
> Object#freeze...
>
> Terry Moore
>
> On 19/10/2011, at 6:26 PM, Michael Johnston wrote:
>
>> Note, in my example I can also guarantee that none of the elements in b are
On Jan 17, 2011, at 6:18 AM, Joel Reymont wrote:
> Has anyone tried wrapping user-land IOKit, e.g.
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> I'd love to use MacRuby to prototype user-land USB drivers.
+1
This would be way cool...
cr
__
On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Stephen Petschulat wrote:
> I've so far tried basic db creation, inserting, and querying. The
> project doesn't have a test suite that I can see and I haven't tried
> out the command line environment.
It has quite a few specs.
https://github.com/jeremyevans/sequel/t
On Jun 30, 2010, at 8:07 PM, MacRuby wrote:
> #768: Timeout is broken. It seems MacRuby does not dispatch the Thread.
> --+-
> Reporter: watson1...@… |Owner: lsansone...@…
> Type: defect
On Jan 10, 2010, at 4:00 PM, isaac kearse wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> http://isaac.kearse.co.nz/draft/
>
> Looking for any and all feedback: technical, writing, whatever...
Good write-up. A couple of syntax errors.
In the TWITTER PROFILE PICTURES paragraph:
"The I construct a NSURL"
Should be "Th
The Grand Central stuff is using the new block syntax introduced for
Obj-C 2.0. That has been discussed publicly so it is no longer
embargoed under NDA.
Any ruby implementation would likely build on the obj-c block syntax,
so that is safe to discuss. How it would specifically tie in to the
How is progress on support FFI? That seems to be the new ruby-way for
interfacing to native code supported by JRuby, Rubinius and to some
extent the 1.9.x codeline. With FFI built in, as gems are updated to
support the other ruby interpreters and/or compilers then MacRuby
would be supported
