Thx for reporting the problem you encountered.
- Matt
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2010, at 9:27, Martijn Walraven wrote:
> I've added a ticket (#996) describing the issue. I wish I could do more to
> help fix it, but I'm afraid I don't know enough about the implementation of
> the VM.
>
I've added a ticket (#996) describing the issue. I wish I could do more to help
fix it, but I'm afraid I don't know enough about the implementation of the VM.
On Nov 14, 2010, at 15:22 , Matt Aimonetti wrote:
> I believe this is a known issue that needs to be addressed. Can you please
> check i
I believe this is a known issue that needs to be addressed. Can you please
check if there is already an open ticket, if not, please open one.
Thx
- Matt
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2010, at 3:05, Martijn Walraven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've looked into the issue some more, and it turns out the
Hi,
I've looked into the issue some more, and it turns out the backtraces created
by MacRuby nightly are much more similar to the 1.9.2 ones. The backtrace still
misses the line referring to the actual execution of the spec though, so the
problem hasn't been completely solved yet.
It seems thi
Hi,
I'm trying to use RSpec (latest version, 2.1.0) with MacRuby, but there seems
to be information missing from the exception backtraces which makes it
difficult to see where exactly specs fail.
Running a straightforward helloworld_spec.rb with a failing example for
instance, shows a referenc
