Thanks guys, with the recent merge, I'm giving git-svn another try :)
- Matt
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Josh Ballanco wrote:
> Hey Matt,
>
> Just to add another data point, I've been using git-svn to interface with a
> svn repo where some of my git branches are matched to svn branches and
>
Hey Matt,
Just to add another data point, I've been using git-svn to interface
with a svn repo where some of my git branches are matched to svn
branches and others are not. In general, my workflow is:
# Make a branch in svn:
$ svn cp svn+ssh://path/to/trunk svn+ssh://path/to/branch/yaml_bra
Nice! :)
On 3 aug 2009, at 22:23, Brian Mitchell wrote:
You could also use:
$ git merge --squash yaml_branch
A little easier than piping a diff.
Brian.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 16:01, Eloy Duran
wrote:
Btw: About git-svn creating many commits, I wouldn't worry about
it :) But
if you'd li
Oh… Why did it annoy you?
My normal workflow is:
$ git svn rebase
$ git checkout -b topic
# work
$ git checkout master
$ git svn rebase
$ git checkout topic
$ git rebase master
$ git checkout master
# And since 10 seconds ago:
$ git merge --squash topic
# sanity check:
$ git svn rebase
# pus
You could also use:
$ git merge --squash yaml_branch
A little easier than piping a diff.
Brian.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 16:01, Eloy Duran wrote:
> Btw: About git-svn creating many commits, I wouldn't worry about it :) But
> if you'd like to normalize, I'd do something like:
> $ git checkout -b y
hmm maybe I should give git-svn another chance. (it annoyed me so much I
went back to svn)
Eloy, would you mind giving a quick rundown of your setup and workflow?
Thanks,
- Matt
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Eloy Duran wrote:
> Btw: About git-svn creating many commits, I wouldn't worry abou
Btw: About git-svn creating many commits, I wouldn't worry about it :)
But if you'd like to normalize, I'd do something like:
$ git checkout -b yaml_branch
# work on it
$ git checkout master
$ git diff yaml_branch | patch -p1
$ git add .
$ git commit -v
Eloy
On 3 aug 2009, at 19:51, Patric
Awesome work Patrick! Thanks a lot for your work on this.
Eloy
On 3 aug 2009, at 19:51, Patrick Thomson wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've just pushed my work on a new YAML module to the experimental
branch (revision 2184). Rather than being backed by the old syck
code that 1.8/1.9 use, this is bac
Hi everyone,
I've just pushed my work on a new YAML module to the experimental branch
(revision 2184). Rather than being backed by the old syck code that
1.8/1.9 use, this is backed by the libYAML library (BSD licensed). As of
right now it appears to be about 4x slower than 1.9's YAML module,
