Thanks Charles for clarifying the situation :) For once, I'm glad to see I
was wrong.
- Matt
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <
charles.nut...@sun.com> wrote:
> Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>
>> Matt Aimonetti wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Charlie,
>>>
>>> I don't think/hope you do it
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Matt Aimonetti wrote:
Hi Charlie,
I don't think/hope you do it on purpose, but it seems that you're
asking questions just to prove that Laurent is wrong and that whatever
he will do will end up slowing down the current experimental branch.
I think you're misint
Matt Aimonetti wrote:
Hi Charlie,
I don't think/hope you do it on purpose, but it seems that you're
asking questions just to prove that Laurent is wrong and that whatever
he will do will end up slowing down the current experimental branch.
I think you're misinterpreting me. I'd love for Lau
Hi Charlie,
I don't think/hope you do it on purpose, but it seems that you're asking
questions just to prove that Laurent is wrong and that whatever he will do
will end up slowing down the current experimental branch.
I understand that you are upset about Antonio Cangiano's blog post with
early
Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
I don't think it's a good idea to provide a way to turn off
optimizations and I do not see the point in benchmarking dead code in
general (I would never do this).
I think it's actually very useful to provide a way to turn off specific
optimizations, if only because t
So, I think there are 2 things to do in order to achieve that goal:
1) making MacRuby an OSA component, so that it's recognized by the
system (osalang, Script Edit, etc.). I have no idea on how to
implement this. If you're willing to check it out, the documentation
is there:
http://dev
On Mar 28, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
It's possible by modifying the source code and comment the call to
createInstructionCombiningPass() and createCFGSimplificationPass(),
but I do not recommend to remove these because I think it would
break
Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
It's possible by modifying the source code and comment the call to
createInstructionCombiningPass() and createCFGSimplificationPass(), but
I do not recommend to remove these because I think it would break the
way we compile Dwarf exception handlers in blocks.
# In my
Hi Charles,
On Mar 28, 2009, at 9:46 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branch for
a few weeks and I thought it's now time to describe what has been
done and were we are going exactly.
Very cool stu
Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branch for a
few weeks and I thought it's now time to describe what has been done and
were we are going exactly.
Very cool stuff...some low-level benchmarks seem to have really
excellent performance.
This is awesome new Laurent!
You have done amazing work to get this far and I know you will get it
all the way.
Also Eloy and Vincent helped a lot with both the VM and specs and
tests. Thanks to all of you!
Do you have any plans for enlisting specific support you need to move
things al
Well if you offer guidance and the target for 0.5 really is just "this
year" then I might be able to give it a shot and help out.
Of course that also depends on whether I get a job immediately after
graduation in August and how busy that keeps me.
On Mar 28, 2009, at 14:56, Laurent Sansonet
Most likely 0.6, unless someone volunteers to do it now :-)
Laurent
On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jordan Breeding wrote:
Will OSA support be a 0.5 or a 0.6 task?
On Mar 28, 2009, at 14:37, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branc
Will OSA support be a 0.5 or a 0.6 task?
On Mar 28, 2009, at 14:37, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branch for
a few weeks and I thought it's now time to describe what has been
done and were we are going exactly.
I wrote a b
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branch for a
few weeks and I thought it's now time to describe what has been done
and were we are going exactly.
I wrote a blog entry here:
http://www.macruby.org/blog/2009/03/28/experimental-branch.html
2 big features in t
15 matches
Mail list logo
