On Apr 10, 2010, at 1:20 AM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
>
> Guys, this isn't the right place to discuss this, I'm afraid. I recommend
> using an official channel such as the Apple Developer Relations.
>
> Thanks :-)
>
> Laurent
I understand and respect your perspective, but when a developer mak
At 1:20 AM -0700 4/10/10, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> Guys, this isn't the right place to discuss this, I'm afraid. I
> recommend using an official channel such as the Apple Developer
> Relations.
>
> Thanks :-)
Not surprisingly, I disagree. The "official channel" does not
offer a forum in which
Guys, this isn't the right place to discuss this, I'm afraid. I recommend using
an official channel such as the Apple Developer Relations.
Thanks :-)
Laurent
On Apr 9, 2010, at 11:16 PM, steve ross wrote:
> I don't know whether anyone will provide a rationale for the contract
> language, but
I don't know whether anyone will provide a rationale for the contract language,
but here's an interesting analysis of it:
http://daringfireball.net/2010/04/why_apple_changed_section_331
Apple makes a lot of smart calls that seem stupid or selfish at first. A number
of folks on Twitter have jump
Hi,
I asked the same question via Twitter, however I do not expect to get an answer
at this stage.
If my understanding is correct about why Apple has done this, in that it is
more due to "the need to support the new multitasking APIs in iPhone 4.0. The
system will now be evaluating apps as the
I suspect that no Apple employee will be able to comment on
this, but I _really_ hope MacRuby will be among the blessed
languages for the iPad, etc.
-r
--
http://www.cfcl.com/rdmRich Morin
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume r...@cfcl.com
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/weblog +1 650-873-7
