Thanks for looking into it. I'll give the code a try tomorrow and get back to
you off list.
Congrats on 0.6!
- Dylan
On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> Hi Dylan,
>
> Unfortunately it's too late for 0.6. I replied inside the bug about the
> potential cause and propose
Hi Dylan,
Unfortunately it's too late for 0.6. I replied inside the bug about the
potential cause and proposed a workaround. If this does not work, we will find
a better one. Feel free to ping me directly in case you cannot disclose your
project on the public tracker.
0.7 development will star
I'm running into variants of #664 more and more frequently. They seem to be
related to nesting blocks on a background thread. The scheduling on the main
thread seems to be a red herring. They can also be a bit intermittent,
although it's 100% reproducible in some cases.
Pulling instances out into
We fixed these bugs plus a couple of new ones. I think 0.6 is ready to roll.
I created a branch called "0.6". We will do more testing, fix things if
necessary there, and I will prepare the release notes.
Let me know asap if you found a critical bug that blocks your Macruby Cocoa
project with 0.
Hi!
> Looks like the version of LLVM that you installed in your system is too old.
> Are you using MacRuby from the nightly builds? It could explain the problem
> then (and if you manually built MacRuby in the past).
You are right, LLVM is an elder version I used compiling MacRuby 0.5. Now i a
Probably not, the only way it could affect Cocoa development is if someone was
doing something like:
NSTextFieldInstance.text = "%6.2" % [5.fdiv(3)]
I haven't tried to see if -[NSString stringWithFormat:] would work instead, but
hopefully it would.
On Apr 23, 2010, at 14:31, Laurent Sansonetti
This one does not seem critical for 0.6, does it?
We are looking for bugs that could seriously impact Cocoa development.
Laurent
On Apr 23, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Jordan Breeding wrote:
> Could you also take a look at https://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/663?
>
> Jordan
>
> On Apr 23, 2010, at 00:3
Hi,
Looks like the version of LLVM that you installed in your system is too old.
Are you using MacRuby from the nightly builds? It could explain the problem
then (and if you manually built MacRuby in the past).
--static only works if you installed LLVM manually. This is a problem that we
shoul
Could you also take a look at https://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/663?
Jordan
On Apr 23, 2010, at 00:31, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> Now:
>
> http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/628 CTFramesetterCreateFrame doesn't like
> the CFRange type
> http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/662 macruby 0.6 bre
My apps are working too!
Unfortunately compiling to static code is broken:
$ cat a.rb
puts 42
$ macrubyc --static a.rb
Undefined symbols:
"llvm::ExecutionEngine::createJIT(llvm::ModuleProvider*,
std::basic_string, std::allocator >*,
llvm::JITMemoryManager*, llvm::CodeGenOpt::Level, bool,
l
For the record, the two MacRuby apps I use daily run perfectly under
0.6trunk.
- Matt
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
> Now:
>
> http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/628 CTFramesetterCreateFrame doesn't
> like the CFRange type
> http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/662 ma
Now:
http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/628 CTFramesetterCreateFrame doesn't like
the CFRange type
http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/662 macruby 0.6 breaks Grow
Laurent
On Apr 21, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> After fixing + triaging more bugs, we selected:
>
> http://www.mac
After fixing + triaging more bugs, we selected:
http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/628 CTFramesetterCreateFrame doesn't like
the CFRange type
http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/656 NSCoder encodeFloat and
decodeFloatForKey doesn't with ruby float
http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/662 macruby 0.
Thank you :-)
I did a quick pass and noted the following bugs already:
https://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/458
https://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/629
https://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/507
https://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/628
Laurent
On Apr 15, 2010, at 7:47 PM, robert gleeson wrote:
> La
Laurent,
Hey, awesome work! I'll check out the nightly later today/tomorrow for me. I
think I've reported a few bugs so I'll check it out and report back to you :-P
Thanks,
Rob
On 16 Apr 2010, at 03:39, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> 0.6 is now almost there. I need to polish a few m
15 matches
Mail list logo
