On 2011-12-24, at 5:00 AM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> On Dec 24, 2011, at 5:01 AM, Mark Rada wrote:
>
>> "Do we want to front end all the AppKit classes?" No, not unless it can
>> be justified, and I don't think it can. Also, while AppKit may have been the
>> original motivation for map
On Dec 24, 2011, at 5:01 AM, Mark Rada wrote:
> "Do we want to front end all the AppKit classes?" No, not unless it can
> be justified, and I don't think it can. Also, while AppKit may have been the
> original motivation for mappings, any class in any framework can have a
> mapping added
Hi guys,
I think Isaac already answered things fairly well, but I still thought I would
throw in my two cents. HotCocoa will be done when Cocoa is dead. Even then, I'm
sure there will still be things to do.
The "goal" of HotCocoa, as I see it, is to make Cocoa apps easier to develop
and mainta
Hi Rich,
Thanks for starting a new thread - I was just getting ready to pollute
the future of MacRuby thread with some more HotCocoa talk :)
Jordan:
"The goal of the project is to simplify the process of creating and
configuring Cocoa objects used when building native Mac apps"
https://github.co
