Bob, I really don't have any information about the Ruby.pdf. In any case, I
would recommend consulting an update to date reference like the ones that I
mentioned below.
Good luck,
-Conrad
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Robert Rice wrote:
> Hi Conrad:
>
> I don't remember where I downloaded
Hi Conrad:
I don't remember where I downloaded my Ruby.pdf file from - it has no credit
information.
I suspect you will have lots of other users upgrading directly from Ruby 1.8.7
to the new MacRuby.
Bob Rice
On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Conrad Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Robert Rice wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jordon:
>>
>> I didn't realize that some core Ruby class methods changed for 1.9. I will
>> update my documentation.
>>
>> Bob Rice
>>
>>
> Bob, this has been well documented
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Robert Rice wrote:
> Thanks Jordon:
>
> I didn't realize that some core Ruby class methods changed for 1.9. I will
> update my documentation.
>
> Bob Rice
>
>
Bob, this has been well documented many months ago in both "Programming Ruby
1.9" by Dave Thomas et al a
Thanks Jordon:
I didn't realize that some core Ruby class methods changed for 1.9. I will
update my documentation.
Bob Rice
On Nov 28, 2009, at 7:18 PM, Jordan Breeding wrote:
> each is not documented for Ruby 1.9 that I know of, only for Ruby 1.8, do you
> have the Pragmatic books? They don'
Hi, String#each is not supported in Ruby 1.9. Also, MacRuby is based
on Ruby 1.9 specification and not 1.8.
-Conrd
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 28, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Jordan Breeding
wrote:
Also, just so you know this really is a 1.8 vs 1.9 problem and not
an MRI vs. MacRuby problem:
7
> each is a documented method for the the string class so it should be
> provided. It is useful.
As Jordan was saying String#each does not exist in 1.9 any more. And MacRuby
implements Ruby 1.9, so before saying something is a bug please check with 1.9.
By the way, 1.8's String#each is now the m
Also, just so you know this really is a 1.8 vs 1.9 problem and not an MRI vs.
MacRuby problem:
76 jor...@thetourist ~ > ruby test.rb
"hello, world!"
77 jor...@thetourist ~ > /opt/homebrew/bin/ruby test.rb
test.rb:3:in `': undefined method `each' for "hello, world!":String
(NoMethodError)
78 jor.
each is not documented for Ruby 1.9 that I know of, only for Ruby 1.8, do you
have the Pragmatic books? They don't like each as valid for String in 1.9.
If you need to file a bug though (especially for your split problem) try
https://www.macruby.org/trac/report
Jordan
On Nov 28, 2009, at 18:09
Hi Jordon:
each is a documented method for the the string class so it should be provided.
It is useful.
How would I go about filing a bug report?
Bob Rice
On Nov 28, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Jordan Breeding wrote:
> I think that String.each was mixed in from Enumerable, which 1.9 no longer
> does.
I think that String.each was mixed in from Enumerable, which 1.9 no longer does.
each is not a method on String in 1.9 either, so I don't think this is a
MacRuby problem.
You should file a bug for the problem with split().
On Nov 28, 2009, at 14:30, Robert Rice wrote:
> Hi Group:
>
> The stri
11 matches
Mail list logo
