Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-10 Thread Matt Aimonetti
a email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> macruby-devel-requ...@lists.macosforge.org >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> macruby-devel-ow...@lists.macosforge.org >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subj

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-10 Thread Kevin Kim
Topics: >> >> 1. Re: The future of MacRuby (Eloy Duran) >> 2. Re: The future of MacRuby (dan sinclair) >> 3. Re: The future of MacRuby (Eloy Duran) >> >> >> -- >> >> Message:

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-09 Thread Jake Smith
acRuby (Eloy Duran) >> 2. Re: The future of MacRuby (dan sinclair) >> 3. Re: The future of MacRuby (Eloy Duran) >> >> >> -- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 23:40:39 +0200

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-09 Thread dan sinclair
Re: The future of MacRuby (Eloy Duran) > 2. Re: The future of MacRuby (dan sinclair) > 3. Re: The future of MacRuby (Eloy Duran) > > > ---------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 23:40:39 +0200 > From: Eloy Duran > To: "MacRuby development dis

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-09 Thread Henry Maddocks
On 9/04/2012, at 8:23 PM, Joshua Ballanco wrote: > What sort of information would you like to see on such a page? Your Boston.rb video covers most of what I wanted to know. I might write something up myself and put it on the wiki for review. Henry ___

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-09 Thread Eloy Duran
> I was wondering if there would be benefit to writing (a) Generator(s) ala' > Rails' "rails" script for the stubbing out of apps and m,v,c ? Imagine: > > facet new > facet g model > … > > Thoughts? I had started on rewriting my tools for that for MacRuby, actually based on the same way Rail

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-09 Thread William Siegrist
it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of MacRuby-devel digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. Re: The future of MacRuby (Eloy Duran) >>> 2. Re: The future of MacRuby (dan sinclair) >>> 3. Re: The future of MacRuby (Eloy

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-09 Thread Kevin Poorman
I can start migrating the macruby-Recipes repository to the wiki section of Github, but I'd like to make the case they should be in a sub-module or repository that users can download directly, not just view on the wiki. I've started, but have largely failed -- due to a new job -- to "port" Mag

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-09 Thread Joshua Ballanco
When I was still at Apple, I actually started work on a library for MacRuby backed by CoreData, but I had to leave it before it was done. To address the "why" question: CoreData ties in very closely with a lot of the Cocoa UI libraries (and other libraries). It also has features that other Ruby

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-09 Thread Joshua Ballanco
What sort of information would you like to see on such a page? On Sunday, April 8, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Henry Maddocks wrote: > > On 7/04/2012, at 11:24 PM, Francis Chong (mailto:fran...@ignition.hk)> wrote: > > > Automatic Reference Counting implements automatic memory management for > > Objecti

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-08 Thread Francis Chong
Compare with ActiveRecord/DataMapper, i really have no love on Core Data. If MacRuby could run all those ActiveRecord/DataMapper adapters, there are few reason to use a Core Data wrapper (much like ruby dev will not ever normally use mysql/postgres gem directly). Certainly if such wrapper follo

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-08 Thread Colin Thomas-Arnold
tl;dr: I propose getting tutorials and code under one structured collection, and to create classes that wrap Core Data in the same way HotCocoa wraps NSViews. I agree with the sentiments about "setting ourselves apart". How do we do that? Please allow me to pontificate. I apologize for the length.

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-08 Thread Francis Chong
While i totally agree the points here, a more pressing need, IMHO, is fixing bugs and incompatibility of MacRuby such that what works on other implementation just works in MacRuby, For instance, require_relative is not implemented which breaks a lot of 1.9 ruby code. (http://www.macruby.org/tra

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-08 Thread Andy Park
On 6 Apr 2012, at 00:06, Matt Aimonetti wrote: > Many of you have been wondering what is going on with the MacRuby project > given the lack of up-to-date releases and overall communication. > I feel we owe you some explanation. > Matt, as someone trying to ship a product based on MacRuby, I'd

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-08 Thread Henry Maddocks
On 7/04/2012, at 11:24 PM, Francis Chong wrote: > Automatic Reference Counting implements automatic memory management for > Objective-C objects and blocks. If you read MacRuby source code, you will > found that the VM is not even written in Objective-C! This is why a one page description of h

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-08 Thread Matt Aimonetti
Eloy Duran) >> >> >> ---------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 23:40:39 +0200 >> From: Eloy Duran >> To: "MacRuby development discussions." >> >> Subjec

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-08 Thread Jake Smith
) > 2. Re: The future of MacRuby (dan sinclair) > 3. Re: The future of MacRuby (Eloy Duran) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 23:40:39 +0200 > From: Eloy Duran mailto:eloy.de.en...@gmail.com)> > To: "MacRuby development discussions." > (mailto:

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-07 Thread Eloy Duran
> Can you import before it's open? I just assumed it wasn't accessible at all > until enable? It looks like forgeplucker (http://home.gna.org/forgeplucker/) > has support to pull tickets out of trac and dump to JSON. Should be pretty > easy to go from JSON to GitHub API I'd expect. Well, we’d o

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-07 Thread dan sinclair
Can you import before it's open? I just assumed it wasn't accessible at all until enable? It looks like forgeplucker (http://home.gna.org/forgeplucker/) has support to pull tickets out of trac and dump to JSON. Should be pretty easy to go from JSON to GitHub API I'd expect. I can take a look and s

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-07 Thread Eloy Duran
> Can we get the issues section enabled on github and move off of Trac? (Not > sure how hard it would be to import all of the old trac stuff to Github). > > Would be nice to consolidate everything in one place. I think that’s an excellent idea. However, it’s probably better to first import tick

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-07 Thread dan sinclair
Can we get the issues section enabled on github and move off of Trac? (Not sure how hard it would be to import all of the old trac stuff to Github). Would be nice to consolidate everything in one place. dan On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote: > *Many of you have been wonderi

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-07 Thread Eloy Duran
The technology by the name “ARC” actually inserts the required code at compile time and only for Objective-C(++). The principal of ARC, however, can be applied to MacRuby. On 7 apr. 2012, at 13:13, Henry Maddocks wrote: > > On 7/04/2012, at 6:13 PM, Joshua Ballanco wrote: > >> Regarding ARC,

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-07 Thread Francis Chong
this is a great news. looking forward to see it in action! Laurent Sansonetti 於 2012年4月7日 下午8:37 寫道: > Yes, ARC as is can't be used in MacRuby, but the principles can be > ported. Which is what I did, more or less, in an experimental branch. > Now, there are various challenges to solve in order t

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-07 Thread Laurent Sansonetti
Yes, ARC as is can't be used in MacRuby, but the principles can be ported. Which is what I did, more or less, in an experimental branch. Now, there are various challenges to solve in order to reach stability, but don't worry, we will get there. Laurent 2012/4/7 Francis Chong : > Automatic Referen

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-07 Thread Francis Chong
Automatic Reference Counting implements automatic memory management for Objective-C objects and blocks. If you read MacRuby source code, you will found that the VM is not even written in Objective-C! Henry Maddocks 於 2012年4月7日 下午7:13 寫道: > > On 7/04/2012, at 6:13 PM, Joshua Ballanco wrote: >

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-07 Thread Henry Maddocks
On 7/04/2012, at 6:13 PM, Joshua Ballanco wrote: > Regarding ARC, MacRuby cannot use ARC. That is, MacRuby cannot use the Obj-C > implementation of ARC. Why is that? Henry ___ MacRuby-devel mailing list MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org http://lis

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread Joshua Ballanco
On Friday, April 6, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Henry Maddocks wrote: > > The MacRuby VM is very nicely tailored to the job of running on top of the > > Objective-C runtime. It is also fairly mature. Personally, I see no > > technical reason that a proliferation of VMs should be a problem (there are > > a

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread Seth Willits
> What I'd like to suggest is the following: > > 1. Define clear goals for MacRuby that we can easily evaluate: > >- Focus primarily on making MacRuby the tool to use for quickly >prototyping OS X and iOS applications. This is the wrong thing for "MacRuby" to focus on, in my opinion.

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread Henry Maddocks
On 7/04/2012, at 1:13 PM, Joshua Ballanco wrote: > I gave a talk last year to Boston.rb that they graciously taped and put > online. You can find it here: > http://bostonrb.org/presentations/macruby-what-is-it-and-why-should-i-care-part-1 > . Hopefully it should answer most of your questions

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread Joshua Ballanco
On Friday, April 6, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Henry Maddocks wrote: > I have Ruby, C, C++ and Obj-C experience, but the one thing that is holding > me up from contributing is a simple one page description from the source > level of what happens when you run a script in MacRuby. Is anyone able to > write

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread Henry Maddocks
I've been a happy user of MacRuby for a while now and I have been intending to give back by helping with the development, so Matt's message is timely and inspirational. Here is a brain dump of some of the thoughts I've had about the project. I'd like to see a statement of the goal for MacRuby.

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread Daniel Westendorf
Here are the initial results of the survey. I'll update the results again on Monday once everyone has had a chance to fill it out. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22962502/survey_results.pdf Daniel On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Westendorf wrote: > Wow, lots of news there. Thanks for the explan

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread Joshua Ballanco
Hi Denny, On Friday, April 6, 2012 at 4:34 AM, denny trebbin wrote: > for me I can tell the story about losing interests in MacRuby and stopping to > use it began with rejecting feature suggestions/requests here on the mailing > list. For example the automated snake_case to humbleCase and vise v

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread Matt Aimonetti
Thanks a lot Andrew for the feedback. I think you have some really great points in there. I'm letting others weigh-in to gage the interest and then we can start getting organized. - Matt On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Andrew Havens wrote: > I've been a lurker in this mailing list for a while n

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread denny trebbin
Hello Matt, for me I can tell the story about losing interests in MacRuby and stopping to use it began with rejecting feature suggestions/requests here on the mailing list. For example the automated snake_case to humbleCase and vise versa conversion. Just by the saying 'JRuby does it to so why

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The Future of MacRuby

2012-04-06 Thread Andrew Havens
I've been a lurker in this mailing list for a while now. Sad to hear we've lost a project lead but glad to hear Matt has identified many of the issues I've been feeling myself. I'm a self-taught web developer. I never had any interest in learning native app development until I heard about MacRu

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-05 Thread Chong Francis
Thank you for your update. It's sad that Apple seems abandon the MacRuby project, but this is also a chance to bring MacRuby closer to what we (as developers and users) need instead of what Apple want. I certainly agree that removing libauto is a primary goal, as OSX and iOS are both going to

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-05 Thread Marcos Villacampa
Thanks for all the info Matt. As a very new member of the MacRuby community, I don't feel like I have the right to decide about it's future, but here are some of the things that I think would help MacRuby create enough "hype" and get a lot more attention from developers: - Add the necessary mo

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-05 Thread az...@gmx.net
Thanks for the update Matt. I haven't actually used MacRuby since my last app, although would love to see it for iOS (as well as keeping OS X support). I guess that would get a lot more people interested too, given the success and popularity of the iOS platform. I think most of your other sugge

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-05 Thread Douglas Tykocki
Personally, I want to see this project succeed like Rubinus and JRuby has, but is it possible without some support from Apple? That said, I would love to help out with building sample apps, docs, and building some gems. What helped me the most when learning to develop on iOS was the availability of

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-05 Thread Daniel Westendorf
Wow, lots of news there. Thanks for the explanation Matt. I created a quick survey to help quantify and gauge how the community feels. Please fill it out. http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/J5JLMFT Daniel On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote: > *Many of you have been wondering what

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-05 Thread Mark Rada
Opening the flood gates to new contributors sounds great. I have been having less and less free time as of late and haven't been able to keep up with the few things I do to contribute. Watson has been carrying the project almost entirely by himself for the last few months. MacRuby is a large pro

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-05 Thread Matt Aimonetti
Absolutely, thanks for clarifying my poorly worded statement. - Matt On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Scott Ribe wrote: > On Apr 5, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote: > > > • the target platform (OS X) isn't the one we all really want to > target (iOS) > > The target platform is only

Re: [MacRuby-devel] The future of MacRuby

2012-04-05 Thread Scott Ribe
On Apr 5, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote: > • the target platform (OS X) isn't the one we all really want to target > (iOS) The target platform is only 1 of 2 that many of us really want to target? -- Scott Ribe scott_r...@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ (303) 722-0