#197: A removed, or undefined, pure Objective-C method should raise a
NoMethodError when called.
-+--
Reporter: eloy.de.en...@… | Owner: lsansone...@…
Type: enhancement | Status
I have discussed this with Laurent and will post the results here for
completeness.
The problem with the objc runtime is that if a method were to be
removed and is called from the objc runtime,
it would lead to seg faults. Therefor the warning is raised, so people
don't have to look through
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Eloy Duran wrote:
> on pure objc classes. It would remove the method and replace it with a
> stub which raises a NoMethodError.
This may be a naive question but.. would it not be more appropriate to
trigger the method_missing functionality?
m/
--
Matt Mower :: h
Yes, that might be a better option.
In my naivety, I mentioned this to Laurent as well, but it got lost in
the discussion a bit.
So Laurent, any input?
Eloy
On Jan 6, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Matt Mower wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Eloy Duran
wrote:
on pure objc classes. It would rem
#198: Bug in class constant lookup.
-+--
Reporter: eloy.de.en...@… | Owner: lsansone...@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: blocker
#199: Calling super from #respond_to? causes SystemStackError
-+--
Reporter: eloy.de.en...@… | Owner: lsansone...@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority:
Hi everyone,
I am new to the mailing list. Looking forward to watching MacRuby
evolve. Would love to help somehow.
-Gp
___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
#198: Bug in class constant lookup.
-+--
Reporter: eloy.de.en...@… | Owner: lsansone...@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: blocker
#182: The constant lookup in MacRuby does not behave correctly
+---
Reporter: vincent.isamb...@… | Owner: lsansone...@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Pr
#198: Bug in class constant lookup.
-+--
Reporter: eloy.de.en...@… |Owner: lsansone...@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: blocker
10 matches
Mail list logo
