On Jan 1, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
> Are there documented Best Practices for MacRuby app organization? I'd assume
> that these would start with the organizations used by Xcode and the packaging
> tool, but I could also imagine slots for documentation, tests, etc.
The rip folks have b
I've seen Apple's “File System Overview,” at
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/BPFileSystem/BPFileSystem.html
Is there something similar for the XCode structure?
--
http://josephholsten.com
On Jan 1, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote:
> The recommendat
Hi Buddy,
I would advise to use the "regular" way, aka using Xcode, Interface Builder etc.
I could think of two reasons for that:
1/ HotCocoa is, as far as I know, not maintained anymore
2/ By using Interface Builder, you'll learn more about writing Cocoa apps,
wether it is in MacRuby or Objectiv
Ahh, okay. I think i'll proceed with doing it the regular way.
I was actually hoping to submit to the Mac AppStore. I hope they allow on
there if it is a self contained app.
Thanks for the reply
Buddy
---
Buddy Lindsey
http://www.buddylindsey.com
http://www.twitter.com/buddylindsey
On Sun, Jan
Sent from my iPad
On 3/01/2011, at 5:03 AM, Thibault Martin-Lagardette
wrote:
> However, please be aware that as of today, it is not possible to submit, on
> the AppStore (the iOS AppStore), an application that has been written using
> MacRuby :-(.
Why not? What information do you have?
H
Ios== iphone &ipad
Reasons are the missing garbage collector for now
Cheers
ben
On 2 Jan 2011, at 21:55, Henry Maddocks wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 3/01/2011, at 5:03 AM, Thibault Martin-Lagardette
> wrote:
>
>> However, please be aware that as of today, it is not possible to su
On Jan 2, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Henry Maddocks wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 3/01/2011, at 5:03 AM, Thibault Martin-Lagardette
> wrote:
>
>> However, please be aware that as of today, it is not possible to submit, on
>> the AppStore (the iOS AppStore), an application that has been wri
Sent from my iPad
On 3/01/2011, at 10:30 AM, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> I think Thibault may have been a little too terse in his statement, leaving
> it ambiguous as to why. This is not a question of developer agreements
> (which have been broadened since the original clause 3.3.1 was dra
Henry,
That is awesome you have MacRuby apps pending. Please let us know if they
make it. I am planning and working on my app based on the assumption that it
will be accepted. Knowing one will would relieve a lot of stress about doing
it.
Thanks.
Buddy
---
Buddy Lindsey
http://www.buddylindsey.c
Rspec2 will work in some cases, have different behaviour from CRuby sometimes,
and segfault other times.
I just started playing with Rspec2 recently and intend to log more bugs when I
can reduce them.
On 2010-12-31, at 10:04 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote:
> RSpec2 should be working, I'm not sure a
Thanks Mark, filing bugs would def. help.
- Matt
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 2, 2011, at 23:43, Mark Rada wrote:
> Rspec2 will work in some cases, have different behaviour from CRuby
> sometimes, and segfault other times.
>
> I just started playing with Rspec2 recently and intend to log more
e.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Buddy
> >
> > ---
> > Buddy Lindsey
> > http://www.buddylindsey.com
> > http://www.twitter.com/buddylindsey
> > ___
> > MacRuby-devel mailing list
> > MacRuby-devel@lists.macosfor
Hi Brad,
MacRuby already ships with a testing framework, but you can install others
using macgem.
In case you find a problem, please report it to us on the bug tracker.
Laurent
On Dec 31, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Brad Hutchins wrote:
> Will Rspec2 and Cucumber be brought into MacRuby for test first?
Hi Buddy,
This has aready been discussed on the list recently. See:
http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macruby-devel/2010-November/006475.html
Laurent
On Jan 2, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Buddy Lindsey, Jr. wrote:
> Henry,
>
> That is awesome you have MacRuby apps pending. Please let us know if the
Hi Laurent,
I have read both of those and understand them, and have confidence that
MacRuby apps will be accepted. However, Apple tends to do some odd stuff at
times so I was just noting that I would like to hear of one "actually" being
accepted as opposed to "should be" accepted. I haven't, yet,
while i was doing some programming earlier today i noticed that passing the
|= operator to the send method of an array results in an NoMethodError
here is simple gist of an irb session demonstrating the bug:
https://gist.github.com/763108
also - i noticed this which is unrelated but may also be a
`a |= b` is syntactical sugar for `a = a | b`. If you replace :"|=" with :|
you'll be fine. There's nothing an object can do to fully replicate the
functionality of |=, though — an object has neither the knowledge nor the
abilities needed to rebind a variable above its scope.
This holds true fo
On 3/01/2011, at 4:57 PM, "Buddy Lindsey, Jr." wrote:
> . I haven't, yet, heard of any being officially accepted yet, but then I am
> new to the list and google hasn't produced much either. Just a lot of
> speculation that Apple should accept them.
I'm pretty sure there are MacRuby apps that
Ah, and your other link is because it interprets your code as `foo(bar: (true {
})) `. You must either use parens as you did below, or replace the braces with
do…end, as this has lower precedence.
On Jan 3, 2011, at 5:35, Zachary Kaplan wrote:
> while i was doing some programming earlier today
19 matches
Mail list logo