Re: [MacRuby-devel] Does MacRuby Play Well with RVM?

2011-05-21 Thread Chris Rhoden
The point of my email was: Use RVM to install 1.9.2 or jRuby or whatever. Install MacRuby from source or the package, and execute it using `macruby`, `macirb`, and the like. There is no reason to overload `ruby` to point at macruby, which is the only real benefit RVM gets you. On Fri, May 20, 20

Re: [MacRuby-devel] Does MacRuby Play Well with RVM?

2011-05-21 Thread Mark Rada
Not true. For those of us that have a lot of gems, being able to use gemsets with MacRuby can yield significant speed ups when loading something that requires a gem. As a quick benchmark I chose to load the "abstract" gem because it is a single file weighing in at 75 lines (including comments

Re: [MacRuby-devel] Does MacRuby Play Well with RVM?

2011-05-21 Thread Chris Rhoden
This is a problem with MacRuby, not Rubygems On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Mark Rada wrote: > Not true. > > For those of us that have a lot of gems, being able to use gemsets with > MacRuby can yield significant speed ups when loading something that requires > a gem. > > As a quick benchmark

Re: [MacRuby-devel] Does MacRuby Play Well with RVM?

2011-05-21 Thread Mark Rada
The topic is rvm with MacRuby, so it is a relevant point. And the problem is not just MacRuby, but both are being actively developed right now so the point is kind of moot. Mark Rada mr...@marketcircle.com On 2011-05-21, at 11:42 PM, Chris Rhoden wrote: > This is a problem with MacRuby, not