change end
>> end
=> nil
>> n = Notifier.new
=> #
>> n.addObserver(Observer.new, forKeyPath:'value', options:0, context:nil)
=> nil
>> n.value = 42
=> 42
>> n.setValue 42
{"kind"=>1}
=> nil
Best,
Jeremy Voorhis
_
at
can actually account for how views *appear*?
Best,
Jeremy Voorhis
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Alex Vollmer wrote:
> On May 11, 2009, at May 11, 11:18 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote:
>
> Before I get too excited, I'd like to hear what you guys think and what you
> believe you need
t; not forget about it?
>
> Thanks,
> Laurent
>
> On May 12, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Jeremy Voorhis wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been learning Cocoa, Objective-C and macruby in tandem and I was
>> just wondering, are there any plans to integrate the key-value
&
Hello,
I've just noticed that, at least in 0.4, Fiber#resume causes a
segfault. I found this ticket in trac which obliquely addresses the
issue: https://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/81.
Laurent: would a new ticket for this issue be helpful or noisy in this case?
Best,
Jeremy Vo
can keep tabs on this.
Thanks for the additional examples.
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jeremy Voorhis wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've just noticed that, at least in 0.4, Fiber#resume causes a
>> segfault. I found this ticket in trac which obliquely addr
Cocoa, and that the infrastructure is
implemented in the base class for every object in the MacRuby runtime.
Best,
Jeremy Voorhis
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Thilo wrote:
> Isn't it already working? At least for primitiv types?
>
> Eg. when I bind a label to a Int property which
ERB is part of Ruby's core library, and as such, is included with
MacRuby. I just poked around in macirb 0.4 and it seems to be working
as expected.
Best,
Jeremy
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Mic Pringle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is Erb included in 0.4 MacRuby ... and if so is it fully functional ?
>
Personally, I'm in favor of a single mailing list, especially with a
small group like this. If there is some perception that a name ending
in -devel is intimidating, maybe we should just be pitched as "the
MacRuby mailing list" :)
Best,
Jeremy
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Laurent Sansonetti
Mike,
Is your code available anywhere, e.g. on github? I haven't looked at
the PyObjC code myself, but I'd be interested in having really decent
CoreMIDI support available in MacRuby.
Btw, when C extensions are supported, simple apps will be able to use
my MusicPlayer lib at
http://github.com/jvo
ompatible.
>
> - Matt
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Jeremy Voorhis wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> Is your code available anywhere, e.g. on github? I haven't looked at
>> the PyObjC code myself, but I'd be interested in having really decent
>&
If MacRuby is aiming for full FFI support, a la JRuby, then creating
interpreter-independent versions of C extensions need not be difficult. I've
begun porting some of my own Ruby bindings from DL and C and have found that
as long as you handle your C types correctly, everything tends to Just Work
When MacRuby's FFI support is more mature, declaring an FFI::Struct subclass
like this will be another option.
class MapPoint < FFI::Struct
layout :row, :int, :col, :Int
end
You instantiate an FFI::Struct with a pointer. I'm hacking away on a Ruby
interface to a C library, and I'm slinging
I've reproduced it using 0.4, for whatever that's worth. If you open a
builtin class (e.g. NSSet) with the class keyword, the object_id changes. If
you open it with class_eval, the object_id is unchanged.
Best,
Jeremy
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2009,
>
> i.e. the argument to defined? must be put in parentheses else MacRuby
> crashes.
>
Only because && binds more tightly than method application.
It would be nice if some of this code found its way into the Platform gem,
or similar. I've found myself writing Kernel#macruby? in libraries a couple
I've just installed the latest MacRuby beta binaries on my new macbook, and
this happens:
Jeremy-Voorhiss-MacBook-Pro:~ jvoorhis$ cat test.rb
require 'hotcocoa'
include HotCocoa
application do |app|
win = window :size => [100,50]
b = button :title => 'Hello'
b.on_action { puts 'World!' }
w
So, can the TCO elimination pass actually perform TCO for mutually recursive
methods and the compiler just isn't phrasing method invocations in a
compatible way? Also, better method inlining support is awesome, but my
intuition tells me that there isn't a lot of overlap between implementing
TCO and
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> There is currently no plan about implementing the FFI API in MacRuby. It
> was my plan originally but apparently the API is not really used, so I
> preferred to support C extensions instead, which will be in the next
> rel
>
> We already have a basic implementation of attach_function in MacRuby based
> on LLVM, but it has not been tested well. And we have a class similar to
> MemoryPointer too (called Pointer) which also uses LLVM to generate
> conversion stubs.
>
> I think it shouldn't be hard to finish FFI inside M
>
>
> We don't really have a choice, the C API does not offer all the features we
> need and we also need to follow the new LLVM changes internally. Hopefully,
> the LLVM team is always helping us :-)
>
I wouldn't expect you to use the C API internally, but it's convenient to
wrap it with FFI. Tha
19 matches
Mail list logo
