I guess I'm looking at it as an equal access question. If I want a chat
communications app to be 'accessible' then it wasn't unreasonable to
download and configure Growl to make that happen. Not quite equal but
quite doable, like adding a screen reader. So do we cross some line when
a chat app
Even without self-voicing, I find apps like Adium and Skype quite accessible.
It might be less convenient but I wouldn't call it less accessible.
On Oct 7, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Chris Blouch wrote:
I guess I'm looking at it as an equal access question. If I want a chat
communications app to
Hi: I have growl installed. In skype, it announces that there is an incoming
message but it doesn't speak anything about. Is it the case I am doing wrong
with any parameter?
Vítor Oliveira
vitoroliveira2...@gmail.com
A 07/10/2011, às 18:06, Chris Blouch escreveu:
I guess I'm looking at it
Yes, it's not a wallet breaker, but should you have to pay another $2 to
make a free chat app accessible?
CB
On 10/5/11 9:12 PM, erik burggraaf wrote:
If it's 2 bucks I'm gonna pay and be happy to have the service. It's
so useful that apple should just buy it and build it into the OS.
Hi. I downloaded the new version of Growl but didn't notice any changes besides
the history thing. I still experience alerts not spoken automatically when
using the Nuance voices with Voice Over. I'm still having to press the control
key twice in order to hear them.
Shawn
--
You received
So I just had somebody ping me about upgrading to Lion and how they
would need to update Growl but now it was $2 instead of free. This got
me wondering. For many chat apps, or at least the ones I use often like
Skype, AIM and Adium, Growl is the common way to get incoming messages
read. If
If it's 2 bucks I'm gonna pay and be happy to have the service. It's so useful
that apple should just buy it and build it into the OS.
Erik Burggraaf
This month in Ebony Promos: Two new gps systems for demo. Mac OS Lion When will
it be supported? Ebony Consulting at accessibility
