Samba support dropped (was Re: N810 WE)

2009-01-18 Thread Quim Gil
ext Marius Gedminas wrote: > Wait, what's this about Samba being dropped? http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Maemo_roadmap/Fremantle#Samba See also the comments below https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2905#c8 -- Quim Gil ___ maemo-developers mailing li

Maemo Official Applications Bug Jar 2009.03

2009-01-18 Thread Stephen Gadsby
A Quick Look at Maemo Official Applications in Bugzilla (https://bugs.maemo.org/). 2009-01-12 through 2009-01-18 As of 2009-01-19 Maemo Official Applications contains 1230 (+5 this week) items, including 430 open issues (+1 this week): * 253 open bugs (-1 this week) * 4 critical/blocker (-

Maemo Official Platform Bug Jar 2009.03

2009-01-18 Thread Stephen Gadsby
A Quick Look at Maemo Official Platform in Bugzilla (https://bugs.maemo.org/). 2009-01-12 through 2009-01-18 As of 2009-01-19 Maemo Official Platform contains 1680 (+10 this week) items, including 376 open issues (-6 this week): * 255 open bugs (-7 this week) * 4 critical/blocker (no chang

Re: N810 WE

2009-01-18 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:46:28PM -0500, John Holmblad wrote: >> Andrew, >> >> thanks for sharing that link. >> >> The point about Samba support being dropped after recently being added >> makes me wonder what is going on here. > > Wait,

Re: Beta testing a simple communication package

2009-01-18 Thread Ville M. Vainio
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Cedric Cellier wrote: > So if you are interrested by unified communication and/or cloud computing > (sorry for so many buzwords), curious or just plain masochist, and are able to Speaking of cloud computing, are you using google app engine on the web server side

Re: SQLite3

2009-01-18 Thread Kamen Bundev
Nick, Yes, I know the changes and I'm not against using 3.6.10 on Maemo. I even compiled 3.6.8 the other day to test it. I had the wrong impression that i read there are file format changes, but maybe it was for an even older version. However that's not the point. The point is that 3.6.10 is not t

RE: SQLite3

2009-01-18 Thread Dr. Nicholas Shaw
Kamen, Even if 3.4.1 worked in command line, I can’t see why you would want to use it when 3.6.10 is the current release. Here are some of the changes from 3.4.2 to 3.6.0: http://www.sqlite.org/34to35.html (from 3.4.2 to 3.5.0) · The OS interface layer was completely reworked

Re: maemo 5 on OMAP3 dev board

2009-01-18 Thread Carsten V. Munk
Mike Turquette wrote: > Thanks for the link to the beagle thread, I should have searched the > list first. I'm looking to do more than just get support for the > beagle however. I'm interested in being able to build all of the FOSS > portions of Maemo 5 from upstream sources via OE. Sure Scratch

Re: maemo 5 on OMAP3 dev board

2009-01-18 Thread Mike Turquette
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Ryan Abel wrote: >> On Jan 17, 2009, at 8:13 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: >> >>> I'm a developer at Texas Instruments. I'm interested in building as >>> many pieces of Maemo 5 (especially Hildon) as possible

Re: SQLite3

2009-01-18 Thread Kamen Bundev
Yep, no luck for Fremantle yet too... :) https://bugzilla.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3215 But at least he can compile the 3.4.1 executable, it will use the lib that's already there. On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:27 AM, wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Dr. Nicholas Shaw wrote: > > > If 3.4.1 is part of

Re: N810 WE

2009-01-18 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:46:28PM -0500, John Holmblad wrote: > Andrew, > > thanks for sharing that link. > > The point about Samba support being dropped after recently being added > makes me wonder what is going on here. Wait, what's this about Samba being dropped? Marius Gedminas -- Hoping

Re: Beta testing a simple communication package

2009-01-18 Thread Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente
Sounds interesting! 2009/1/17, Cedric Cellier : > -[ Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 09:02:17PM +, Andrew Flegg ] >> How does it relate to Telepathy, Conduit and OpenSync; if at all? > > It's independant on anything. I didn't knew Conduit nor OpenSync, but > considered Kolab before rejecting it becau