RE: [maemo-developers] examining n800 kernel

2007-01-17 Thread Jakub.Pavelek
>> I've been looking at the n800 kernel source in bora repository to >> figure out what n800 is like comparing to the n770. Here is >a summary >> of some things I found. As I don't have the device I may be >wrong with >> something that could be easily verified. >> >> kernel is 2.6.18-omap1 - e

Re: [maemo-developers] examining n800 kernel

2007-01-17 Thread Kalle Valo
"Frantisek Dufka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > WI-FI > > seems to be same chip as in (newer) N770 devices (?), similar firmware > blobs (3825.arm, 3826.arm) probably newer versions. Hopefully the > speed will be better that those 500KB/s on N770 thanks to rest of the > system. The SPI bus is fas

Re: [maemo-developers] examining n800 kernel

2007-01-17 Thread Larry Battraw
On 1/16/07, Frantisek Dufka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've been looking at the n800 kernel source in bora repository to figure out what n800 is like comparing to the n770. Here is a summary of some things I found. As I don't have the device I may be wrong with something that could be easily

Re: [maemo-developers] examining n800 kernel

2007-01-17 Thread Frantisek Dufka
Larry Battraw wrote: On 1/16/07, Frantisek Dufka wrote: Seems to be 2.0, capable of high speed mode (480MBits), chip is TUSB6010 by TI. No usb host mode is compiled in the kernel. Usb host mode support was also removed from initfs (usb booting) so this may look bad. Looking at the "shiny broc

Re: [maemo-developers] examining n800 kernel

2007-01-16 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On 1/16/07, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OMAP1 uses something called SOSSI, OMAP2 calls it RFBI (remote frame > buffer ...) Interesting is that omap framebuffer driver now contains > code for synchronization on vblank and preventing tearing effect. It is > both in omapfb/blizzard/rfb

Re: [maemo-developers] examining n800 kernel

2007-01-16 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 02:57:16PM +0100, ext Frantisek Dufka wrote: > similar setup like N770 but hopefully improved (finally no memory > bicycle but proper bus?). The external videochips seems to be from epson > too, not 472 but 475 (or 4 in early prototypes?) called Blizzard and > Hailstorm.

Re: [maemo-developers] examining n800 kernel

2007-01-16 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Frantisek, > BT > > Was already discussed, see the bt headsed thread - Bluecore4 CSR chip > capable of BT2.0, driver is called hci_h4p in drivers/bluetooth/hci_h4p > (not present in mainline kernel?). the mainline inclusion is work in progress, but the driver (especially its firmware handli

[maemo-developers] examining n800 kernel

2007-01-16 Thread Frantisek Dufka
Hi, I've been looking at the n800 kernel source in bora repository to figure out what n800 is like comparing to the n770. Here is a summary of some things I found. As I don't have the device I may be wrong with something that could be easily verified. kernel is 2.6.18-omap1 - everybody proba