Till Harbaum / Lists ha scritto:
> yesterday i uploaded 0.7.21
> Which version did you re-upload?
The previous one, 0.7.20, with a higher epoch.
Your new upload should take precedence with no extra help.
A.
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-devel
Hi,
yesterday i uploaded 0.7.21
Which version did you re-upload?
Till
Am Freitag 02 Oktober 2009 schrieb Andrea Borgia:
> Till Harbaum / Lists ha scritto:
>
> >> Do you mind if I go ahead and upload the fixed package?
> > Not at all. Please go ahead.
>
> It's done: builds ok and is installabl
Till Harbaum / Lists ha scritto:
>> Do you mind if I go ahead and upload the fixed package?
> Not at all. Please go ahead.
It's done: builds ok and is installable from extras-devel, so I'm
promoting it now.
A.
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-de
Hi,
Am Mittwoch 30 September 2009 schrieb Andrea Borgia:
> Do you mind if I go ahead and upload the fixed package?
Not at all. Please go ahead.
> Or would you rather do it yourself?
I will upload 0.7.21 soon, i am just waiting for some new icons.
Till
Till Harbaum / Lists ha scritto:
> I really don't need an inbox filling up because user think
> i am responsible for this libssl mess.
>
> Please do it now!!! I will eventually upload an updated version,
> but please remove the current version (0.7.20) immediately.
Sorry to bother you but... I a
On Sep 29, 2009, at 18:32, Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Thomas Schmidt ha scritto:
>
>> IMHO you should be able to fix the problem by yourself, just by
>> uploading a new version 0.7.20-maemo2 without any changes apart
>> from the
>> new changelog-entry. As long as the broken libssl has been removed
Thomas Schmidt ha scritto:
> IMHO you should be able to fix the problem by yourself, just by
> uploading a new version 0.7.20-maemo2 without any changes apart from the
> new changelog-entry. As long as the broken libssl has been removed from
> the repository, the new version of osm2go should be bu
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 12.09.2009, 21:35 +0200 schrieb Till Harbaum / Lists:
> hey guys, really, this is no fun. Please, PLEASE just delete
> osm2go from at least the diablo repository
>
> I really don't need an inbox filling up because user think
> i am responsible for this libssl mess.
>
> Pl
Hi,
hey guys, really, this is no fun. Please, PLEASE just delete
osm2go from at least the diablo repository
I really don't need an inbox filling up because user think
i am responsible for this libssl mess.
Please do it now!!! I will eventually upload an updated version,
but please remove the
Hi,
please remove osm2go entirely from the repositories.
I still get several emails a day regarding problems with various libssl
versions. I just cannot answer them all since i don't even know myself
which versions are where and what conflicts with what.
So please remove osm2go completely from
2009/9/9 Jeremiah Foster :
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 9:43, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>>
>> BTW, before removing it from extras-devel try to find all packages
>> which depend on it and after removing libssl reupload them to the
>> autobuilder. They will be rebuilt with proper openssl then.
>
> How does that work
On Sep 8, 2009, at 9:43, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>
> BTW, before removing it from extras-devel try to find all packages
> which depend on it and after removing libssl reupload them to the
> autobuilder. They will be rebuilt with proper openssl then.
How does that work? I thought the problem was that it
Hi,
Am Dienstag 08 September 2009 schrieb Graham Cobb:
> I haven't checked this out myself but I **think** what Till is seeing is that
> the autobuilder builds his app with the libssl package from extras-devel and
> ...
Yes, what you are describing is exactly what i was trying to say.
Thanks fo
2009/9/8 Jeremiah Foster :
>
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 24:58, Graham Cobb wrote:
>
>> Jeremiah,
>>
>> I haven't checked this out myself but I **think** what Till is
>> seeing is that
>> the autobuilder builds his app with the libssl package from extras-
>> devel and
>> ends up with a versioned dependenc
On Sep 8, 2009, at 24:58, Graham Cobb wrote:
> Jeremiah,
>
> I haven't checked this out myself but I **think** what Till is
> seeing is that
> the autobuilder builds his app with the libssl package from extras-
> devel and
> ends up with a versioned dependency on that specific version of
> l
Jeremiah,
I haven't checked this out myself but I **think** what Till is seeing is that
the autobuilder builds his app with the libssl package from extras-devel and
ends up with a versioned dependency on that specific version of libssl.
However, the extras-devel version of libssl cannot be ins
On Sep 7, 2009, at 21:41, Till Harbaum / Lists wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how can i prevent the autobuilder from using libs from extras-devel?
I don't think it does, I think it uses libs from the SDK. Ed and Niels
will correct me if I'm wrong.
> A user reported this:
>
>> I'm trying to upgrade to the l
Hi,
how can i prevent the autobuilder from using libs from extras-devel?
A user reported this:
>I'm trying to upgrade to the latest version: 0.7.20-meaemo1 but I get
> the following error: Missing application packages: libssl0.9.8 (>=
> 0.9.8f-5)
This is due to the fact that this lib is in extra
18 matches
Mail list logo
