On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:11:09AM +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 07:32:09PM +0100, Neil MacLeod wrote:
> I had a 256 MB SD card die completely while it was plugged into the
> external slot. FWIW, I never removed it, just kept it sitting in the
> external slot when suddenl
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 07:32:09PM +0100, Neil MacLeod wrote:
> Kees Jongenburger wrote:
> > I guess the cards would not be lost , just the data.
> >
> Hopefully! But so far nobody has found any software that can recover
> the cards.
>
> > Apparently it's not a bug that can easily be triggers by
Kees Jongenburger wrote:
> I guess the cards would not be lost , just the data.
>
Hopefully! But so far nobody has found any software that can recover the cards.
> Apparently it's not a bug that can easily be triggers by everybody.
> I have my rootfs running on sdhc with new "latest" release and
> Wow, that's some way scary stuff. I've got a 4gb SDHC card in my n800
> and the patched kernel and I haven't had any corruption yet, thankfully
> (they're expensive!).
I guess the cards would not be lost , just the data.
> Is this a maemo only thing? Or is everyone in the linux community
> exper
Neil MacLeod wrote:
>> It may be that MMC speed is limited to 24Mhz (wonder what NB#54313 is
>> about) for similar reason like N770 MMC speed being limited to 12Mhz -
>>
>
> By the way, #54313 _is_ the MMC is bug #1204[1] in the public bugzilla (you
> can see this in the Alias field). So, t
> It may be that MMC speed is limited to 24Mhz (wonder what NB#54313 is
> about) for similar reason like N770 MMC speed being limited to 12Mhz -
By the way, #54313 _is_ the MMC is bug #1204[1] in the public bugzilla (you can
see this in the Alias field). So, the clock speed has been capped to p
Frantisek Dufka wrote:
> It may be that MMC speed is limited to 24Mhz (wonder what NB#54313 is
> about) for similar reason like N770 MMC speed being limited to 12Mhz -
> better compatibility by sacrificing speed. Sadly this makes perfect
> sense for Nokia.
>
I suspected that to be the situation
Here are relevant parts of kernel changelog
kernel-source-rx-34 (2.6.18-osso42) unstable; urgency=low
* week200713-1 release
* MMC: Add support for mmc v4 high speed mode
* mmc: Support for high speed SD cards
* mmc: Add support for SDHC cards
* mmc: Gracef
Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> The kernel has also had other changes, which IIRC include blacklisting
> some cards, so if you could list exactly which card you're using in the
> bug report, that would help. (Some cards were believed to run okay at
> higher speeds, but would show up data corruption et al
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 01:25:01AM +0100, ext Neil MacLeod wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Depends which sort of card you're using. IIRC, some cards had problems
> > running at a higher frequency, so they have to fall back to lower
> > speeds.
>
> Hi Daniel - same card before and after. The only
Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Depends which sort of card you're using. IIRC, some cards had problems
> running at a higher frequency, so they have to fall back to lower
> speeds.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
Hi Daniel - same card before and after. The only thing that has changed is the
SDHC support
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 12:58:43AM +0100, ext Neil MacLeod wrote:
> Can anyone from explain why the performance of SDHC cards is reduced when
> compared with the performance of the patches made available for the
> 3.2007.10-7 firmware? The new firmware achieves only 50% of the read
> performance
Can anyone from explain why the performance of SDHC cards is reduced when
compared with the performance of the patches made available for the 3.2007.10-7
firmware? The new firmware achieves only 50% of the read performance possible
with the old patched kernel (5.6MB/s when 11.99Mb/s is possible)
13 matches
Mail list logo
