Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-28 Thread Mohammad Anwari
Pada hari Senin, tanggal 20/11/2006 pukul 15:28 +0200, ext Mohammad Anwari menulis: > Hi, > > Currently the file format is not published. Hi, Correcting my self. The file format is available in /usr/share/libimlayouts/fileformat.html in your maemo rootstrap. However, the API to use the file is n

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-23 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Thursday 23 November 2006 22:19, Charles 'Buck' Krasic wrote: > No, my dsp work was actually video related.I did reuse Siarhei > Siamashka's mplayer code to decode/output mp3 directly, but that > obviously doesn't help with speex. Just a disclaimer before anybody starts bashing my ugly hac

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-23 Thread Charles 'Buck' Krasic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 No, my dsp work was actually video related.I did reuse Siarhei Siamashka's mplayer code to decode/output mp3 directly, but that obviously doesn't help with speex. I'd suggest that the most practical approach for now would be to have an application

RE: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-23 Thread Simon Pickering
> > > If you want something free, I'd suggest using our speex > codec, which > > is technically comparable, completely open, and has no known patent > > issues. We don't have an omap dsp implementation, but it has been > > ported to the various TI DSPs. > > > > http://speex.org/ > > > > -r >

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-22 Thread Charles 'Buck' Krasic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralph Giles wrote: > > If you want something free, I'd suggest using our speex codec, > which is technically comparable, completely open, and has no known > patent issues. We don't have an omap dsp implementation, but it has > been ported to the vario

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-22 Thread Ralph Giles
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:47:45PM -0600, Ed Okerson wrote: > The iLBC implementation on the DSP is closed source, but is bitstream > compatible with the one on ilbcfreeware.org. Since people seem confused: iLBC is a semi-proprietary voice codec. The design is documented as RFC 3951, and a refer

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-22 Thread Ed Okerson
> On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:40 +0200, Jari Tenhunen wrote: >> The .ilbc files contain simply raw iLBC frames (20 ms) one after >> another. Exactly the same stuff that dspilbcsrc produces and dspilbcsink >> eats. > > I google'd around, but the only pages mentionning dspilbcsrc or > audio/x-iLBC were

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-22 Thread Laurent GUERBY
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:40 +0200, Jari Tenhunen wrote: > The .ilbc files contain simply raw iLBC frames (20 ms) one after > another. Exactly the same stuff that dspilbcsrc produces and dspilbcsink > eats. I google'd around, but the only pages mentionning dspilbcsrc or audio/x-iLBC were maemo rela

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-22 Thread Laurent GUERBY
Here is a very small file (7KB): http://guerby.org/ftp/Test.ilbc Laurent PS: I made this file to ask Canonical (Ubuntu parent company) if they were able to read it, they answered no and had no knowledge of a debian package doing so. Is the code used on the Nokia 770 for ilbc open source? (I did

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-22 Thread Jari Tenhunen
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:29:09PM +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 12:50 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > >... > > > > But it produces ".ilbc" files that I couldn't read anywhere > > except on my Nokia 770. A converter or direct output in > > a more readily availabl

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-22 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 12:50 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote: >... > > But it produces ".ilbc" files that I couldn't read anywhere > except on my Nokia 770. A converter or direct output in > a more readily available format would be great. Would it be possible to put some samples publicly accessibl

Re: [maemo-developers] Unresolved issues (Week 46)

2006-11-22 Thread Laurent GUERBY
On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 15:13 +0200, Tommi Komulainen wrote: > Here is a list of issues raised on this list I think have not been > concluded so far, in no particular order. The easiest way to get off the > list is to provide answers, but you can also try convincing me other > ways. > > This is an a