Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-15 Thread Juha Kallioinen
ext Santtu Lakkala wrote: Please do note that I use the old debian devkit on purpose, because the goal in my blog post is to be able to compile the same source for different targets, so there cannot anyway be anything using the new features of the newer devkit. I have to admit that I did not

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-15 Thread Luca Donaggio
Yes your instructions have the correct qemu version, but Luca's post revealed that he was using the 0.8.1 version. I hope the final SDK released fixed any problems Luca had. Cheers, Juha -- Juha Kallioinen JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-14 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, ext Luca Donaggio wrote: On Nov 8, 2007 4:04 PM, Gabriel Schulhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:14 +0100, ext Luca Donaggio wrote: It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binary-arm, but

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-09 Thread Santtu Lakkala
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Juha Kallioinen wrote: ext Luca Donaggio wrote: Any clue about how to fix it? I followed these instructions to set up my sbox environment: http://inz.fi/blog/2007/10/22/multi-target-development-for-maemo/ My current parameters for

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-08 Thread Gabriel Schulhof
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:14 +0100, ext Luca Donaggio wrote: It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binary-arm, but I don't have any clue why it happened and how to correct it! IIRC, there is a certain