On Saturday 24 October 2009 02:37:33 Valerio Valerio wrote:
If we forego b.m.o, how do we identify this on the alternatively
suggested packages page ?
In your package debian/control file add: Xsbc-Bugtracker:
bugtracker_web_address
Hm, I did that, the .deb *does* contain the Bugtracker:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs wrote:
On Saturday 24 October 2009 02:37:33 Valerio Valerio wrote:
If we forego b.m.o, how do we identify this on the alternatively
suggested packages page ?
In your package debian/control file add: Xsbc-Bugtracker:
On Thursday 22 October 2009 14:31:38 Quim Gil wrote:
Feedback please. This checklist is common for developers (before
promnoting their applications to extras-testing) and betatesters (before
giving them farewell to reach Extras).
Lack of bug reporting database
http://bugs.maemo.org is the
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs wrote:
On Thursday 22 October 2009 14:31:38 Quim Gil wrote:
Feedback please. This checklist is common for developers (before
promnoting their applications to extras-testing) and betatesters (before
giving them farewell
http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing/QA_Checklist
Feedback please. This checklist is common for developers (before
promnoting their applications to extras-testing) and betatesters (before
giving them farewell to reach Extras).
It would be good to have more specific instructions to measure
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 13:31, Quim Gil quim@nokia.com wrote:
http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing/QA_Checklist
Feedback please. This checklist is common for developers (before
promnoting their applications to extras-testing) and betatesters (before
giving them farewell to reach Extras).
