RE: [maemo-developers] Too busy to accept help? I'm not complaining

2006-05-11 Thread Devesh.Kothari
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of ext Dave Neuer > Sent: 12 May, 2006 00:02 > To: Kothari Devesh (Nokia-M/Tampere) > Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org > Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] Too busy to accept help? I'm not > complaining > > > O

Re: [maemo-developers] Too busy to accept help? I'm not complaining

2006-05-11 Thread Dave Neuer
On 5/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > can you be more specific ??? > > I can remove all software for which I cannot access and re-publish the > source code and all of the hardware capabilities (power management, > DSP and whatever other little doodads Nokia packed in there)

Re: [maemo-developers] python on maemo

2006-05-11 Thread Daniel d'Andrada TenĂ³rio de Carvalho
Hello Christine, ext Christine Liu wrote: [...] [sbox-SDK_ARM: ~/Imaging-1.1.5] > python setup.py bdist_dumb [...] You should write "python2.4 setup.py bdist_dumb" instead. A simple "python" will call scratchbox's own "python2.3" (which is wrong) instead of Maemo's "python2.4". This is a c

Re: [maemo-developers] cant get maemo to my Xnest window

2006-05-11 Thread Andreas Orfanos
Try to set DISPLAY variable outside sb first. A On 5/11/06, Daniel Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem is that there are no errors reported. and the messages seem to be the same from the last time I used Maemo (about 3 months ago). I will get everything from the shell when I get hom

Re: [maemo-developers] cant get maemo to my Xnest window

2006-05-11 Thread Daniel Monteiro
The problem is that there are no errors reported. and the messages seem to be the same from the last time I used Maemo (about 3 months ago). I will get everything from the shell when I get home. thanks anyway Daniel "NeoStrider" Monteiro == Date:

[maemo-developers] Re: gtkmm code size

2006-05-11 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, > I did try to hack libtool to allow me to use regex to exclude anything > with "Anonymous" in the name, to exclude anonymous namespaces, but it > made no difference to code size, though the symbols no longer showed up > in the nm output. Obviously there's more to it than that. At least accor

[maemo-developers] Re: gtkmm code size

2006-05-11 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 11:16 +0200, dodji Seketeli wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder how the default symbols visibilty directives would affect the > total code size of gtkmm. > > In other words, if we say (like on win32) symbols are *not* exported by > default, > and we explicitely flag the exported s

[maemo-developers] Platform Java on the 770 status

2006-05-11 Thread Philippe Laporte
Hi, We have obtained a second 770 unit and have produced better screenshots and videos, which are available at: http://82.193.172.109/screenshots/ RedHat et al have been making constant progress on the AWT problems when running on the 770: two bugs have been closed and a new one opened: h

[maemo-developers] gtkmm code size

2006-05-11 Thread Murray Cumming
I have recently done some work to optimize gtkmm for code size, for use on embedded devices, such as Nokia's 770 internet table. I was concerned that, for instance - the _stripped_ code size of gtkmm 2.6's libgtkmm .so is 2.5M on i686, - which is comparable to the size of libgtk-x11's .so (version

Re: [maemo-developers] Too busy to accept help? I'm not complaining

2006-05-11 Thread Igor Stoppa
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 14:45 -0500, ext Larry Battraw wrote: > On 5/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Behalf Of ext Dave Neuer > > > Sent: 04 May, 2006 23:39 > > > To: Kothari Dev