On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:54:43PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> To add to the debate, the Palm OS in the latest Palm Centro smarphones
> show a Bluetooth icon all the time, greyed when not active and Blue
> when active. You can click on it and easily turn bluetooth on/off.
>
> So simple! isn't
Evening/Morning/G'day all
I have been following the thread on the bluetooth icon with some
interest and would like to get some clarification on some matters.
As i understood it the UI in Maemo is closed so to speak ie Nokia are
not giving out the spcs or did i misunderstand it?
Also if that
To add to the debate, the Palm OS in the latest Palm Centro smarphones
show a Bluetooth icon all the time, greyed when not active and Blue
when active. You can click on it and easily turn bluetooth on/off.
So simple! isn't it?.
Apparently not for the Nokia mindset...
FC
_
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:55:38AM -0600, Mark wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> What's wrong with letting the user decide whether the status
>> >> bar is too
On Sep 26, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> There is a project to combine the Bluetooth and WiFi applets into a
>>> single applet (an "Advanced Connectivity" of sorts), but it hasn't
>>>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:55:38AM -0600, Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> What's wrong with letting the user decide whether the status
> >> bar is too cluttered or not?
> >
> > Simplicity is good. Too many choices are overwhelming.
It can be done by editing the desktop file and removing the mandatory line
or by using my quick deb to do it:
http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums/showthread.php?p=153051
I won't deny though that it isn't really an end-user "solution".
Regards,
Faheem
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Marius
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's wrong with letting the user decide whether the status
>> bar is too cluttered or not?
>
> Simplicity is good. Too many choices are overwhelming. What's wrong
> with letting the user decide whether he wants so
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 09:53:07AM -0600, Mark wrote:
>> Besides, one can choose to hide any of the status bar icons if it's
>> too cluttered, and even pick the order. The problem is that certain
>> ones can't be pinned t
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 09:53:07AM -0600, Mark wrote:
> Besides, one can choose to hide any of the status bar icons if it's
> too cluttered, and even pick the order. The problem is that certain
> ones can't be pinned there.
And certain ones (e.g. presence) can't be hidden at all, which irritates
m
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Eero Tamminen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ext Mark wrote:
>>
>> Wonderful... yet another "wontfix" response to usability issues...
>
> If I understood this correctly, the enhancement requested that
> for a set of users who use separate bluetooth keyboard, t
Hi,
ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is a project to combine the Bluetooth and WiFi applets into a
>> single applet (an "Advanced Connectivity" of sorts), but it hasn't
>> really gotten off the ground lacking anybody with real
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is a project to combine the Bluetooth and WiFi applets into a
> single applet (an "Advanced Connectivity" of sorts), but it hasn't
> really gotten off the ground lacking anybody with real knowledge of
> libconic and the
On Sep 26, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> However, I don't understand what's the problem with this functionality
> being offered by a 3rd party component if the component is easily
> available from the extras repository?
There is a project to combine the Bluetooth and WiFi applets into
Fernando,
I too have considered the N800 to have excellent potential as a
wireless/mobile component in a home automation/home control environment.
Regarding price levels, I did a quick google product search on the N810
whose results are available at the www page whose url is:
http://www.
Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Denis Dimick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I do wish I had the second card slot, however, I don't need the FM radio.
>> I never use the GPS, did use it once when lost, so it's nice to have.
>>
>> Denis
>
> The extra $100 in the price is NO
Hi,
ext Mark wrote:
> Wonderful... yet another "wontfix" response to usability issues...
If I understood this correctly, the enhancement requested that
for a set of users who use separate bluetooth keyboard, the
pre-installed device software usability would be improved by
changing the UI as propo
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:23:18PM +0530, atul raut wrote:
> How to login to Scrach-box without
> password is there any way ?
When I run sb-login, I'm never asked for a password.
Marius Gedminas
--
Hanlon's Razor:
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained
by s
Hi all,
How to login to Scrach-box without
password is there any way ?
br
atul
--
"You Never Get a Second Chance to Make First Good Impression" Atul Raut
Hyderabad - 500 033
On Friday 26 September 2008 00:01:00 Mark wrote:
> Wonderful... yet another "wontfix" response to usability issues...
>
> One problem is that putting the device in offline mode disables
> bluetooth, but taking it out of offline mode usually doesn't re-enable
> bluetooth (at least 75% of the time on
20 matches
Mail list logo
