2006/1/26, Michael Steinmetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also sprach Frantisek Dufka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
For best usage the swap should contain what is really not needed
(like dead code and other inefficiency in libraries and other useless
junk). 16MB could be enough for swapping out this. I also
David D. Hagood wrote:
It seems to me that adding a 20M swap file makes my Nokia *less* stable,
not more. I've tried both swap files on a MMC card as well as swap
partitions, and in both cases it seems that I am more likely to crash
the browser with swap enabled than with swap disabled.
Has
It seems to me that adding a 20M swap file makes my Nokia *less* stable,
not more. I've tried both swap files on a MMC card as well as swap
partitions, and in both cases it seems that I am more likely to crash
the browser with swap enabled than with swap disabled.
Has anybody else seen this?
Hmm, I don't see this with my usage. I think swap is an improvement. But
personally I don't understand complains about 24MB limitation. IMO 24 is
more than enough. Even 16MB is a big improvement.
For best usage the swap should contain what is really not needed (like
dead code and other
Also sprach Frantisek Dufka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
For best usage the swap should contain what is really not needed
(like dead code and other inefficiency in libraries and other useless
junk). 16MB could be enough for swapping out this. I also think that
the improvement seen is caused by
