Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-11-24 Thread Gary
Andrew Daviel wrote: > I have had a ticket open with Proxim for months, but nothing useful yet. > There was a suggestions to "disable unique SSIDs". I forgot to ask as it didn't occur to me before. Are any of your SSIDs "hidden?" I don't recall the strange terminology used by Proxim's web UI bu

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-11-04 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Andrew Daviel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> First of all, sorry for taking so long. I was on vacation and had some >> urgent things to do first. The capture data is really helpful, thanks >> a lot for that. I'm looking at them right now. > > Did yo

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-11-03 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Gary wrote: > I know it's difficult to do in a production environment but have you > experimented with different AP firmware revisions? 3.4.0 is still very > solid but some of the interim releases between there and 3.7 broke more > than it fixed. I'm not on any of their announ

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-10-21 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Kalle Valo wrote: > First of all, sorry for taking so long. I was on vacation and had some > urgent things to do first. The capture data is really helpful, thanks > a lot for that. I'm looking at them right now. Did you ever find anything ? I still have the problem, after a m

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-10-17 Thread Gary
Andrew Daviel wrote: > my problem is that the WiFi eats power talking > to the Proxim APs at work, as if Power Save mode were not enabled I know it's difficult to do in a production environment but have you experimented with different AP firmware revisions? 3.4.0 is still very solid but some of

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-10-15 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Gary wrote: > Andrew Daviel wrote: >> Meantime after trying >> several local stores for an OEM one I found this clone which has worked >> nicely ever since. > > I ask because the only time I had battery issues was when I'd installed > one of the early canola betas. It seemed l

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-10-15 Thread Gary
Andrew Daviel wrote: > Meantime after trying > several local stores for an OEM one I found this clone which has worked > nicely ever since. I ask because the only time I had battery issues was when I'd installed one of the early canola betas. It seemed like it had some background networking task

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-10-15 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Gary wrote: > Andrew Daviel wrote: >> I was measuring the battery current directly: >> http://andrew.triumf.ca/andrew/photos/100_0536.JPG > > That isn't a 3rd party battery is it? Yes. The original Nokia one failed (I think the clips might have fatigued due to vibration in t

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-10-15 Thread Gary
Andrew Daviel wrote: > I was measuring the battery current directly: > http://andrew.triumf.ca/andrew/photos/100_0536.JPG That isn't a 3rd party battery is it? ___ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-10-15 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Gary wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Andrew Daviel wrote: >> measuring the battery current and setting up an AP4000 > > Can I assume this is a Proxim AP? The 700s may be found for a fair price > these days and use the same chipsets and firmware. Of course, the > Nan

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-09-17 Thread Gary
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Andrew Daviel wrote: > measuring the battery current and setting up an AP4000 at home is a bit more time consuming. > Can I assume this is a Proxim AP? The 700s may be found for a fair price these days and use the same chipsets and firmware. Of course, the Nano

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-09-14 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, Andrew Daviel wrote: > https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3708 [EMAIL PROTECTED] points out that I didn't have the latest version via SSU. The updater was not running; half the time it runs out of space so I have to remove packages to run it, and it conflicts with my (

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-09-14 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Kalle Valo wrote: >> I have placed some capture data on my server at >> http://andrew.triumf.ca/reqauth/PSM/ >> (password test/test to keep out robots and the clueless) > > First of all, sorry for taking so long. I was on vacation and had some > urgent things to do first. The

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-08-21 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Andrew Daviel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was able to get the IBM laptop into monitor mode using the madwifi > instructions (thanks) - airodump did not do it as it does on the tablet. > # wlanconfig ath0 destroy > # wlanconfig ath0 create wlandev wifi0 wlanmode monitor > # ifconfig ath0

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-08-08 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, David Grau Serra wrote: > >> Capture files on >> http://andrew.triumf.ca/reqauth/PSM/ >> > It is necessary an user and a pass =-O the user = passwd = "test", which is in the challenge. I had creted that directory for a demo of something else, and placed the capture files th

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-08-06 Thread Alejandro López
Hi, Andrew Daviel wrote: > With beacon SSID enabled on "triumf" but disabled on "test" - <10mA > With beacon SSID enabled on "triumf" and enabled on "test" - 100mA > With beacon SSID disabled on "triumf" but enabled on "test" - 100mA > With beacon SSID disabled on "triumf" and disabled on "test" -

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-08-05 Thread David Grau Serra
> Capture files on > http://andrew.triumf.ca/reqauth/PSM/ > It is necessary an user and a pass =-O ___ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-08-05 Thread Andrew Daviel
I have done some more tests with the Proxim AP4000, but I still cannot see a problem in the protocol. I have put an ammeter inline between the N810 battery and connectors so I can see the current consumption in real time - it is pretty impressive that it can draw virtually no current at all (<

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-30 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Andrew Daviel wrote: > I may be able to get a spare Proxim AP to take home. There's a limit on > what I can mess with on our production WLAN :-7, and I'd have a less > noisy environment. Well, I got one. The power consumption seems normal (i.e. PS mode seems to be working).

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-26 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Kalle Valo wrote: (packets from N810 captured with airodump-ng show as malformed) > Usually missing FCS causes this. There's a setting in Wireshark under > IEEE 802.11 to enable and disable FCS calculation. Try reverting that > option. Yes. Edit/Preferences/Protocols/IEEE 80

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-24 Thread Tony Green
On Wednesday 23 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > After the OS upgrade I started getting low battery warnings when my > > N800 was not connected to AC power for "a while" (less than a few > > hours).  I do not remember having this problem when my N800 was > > running OS2007. > > I would first

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-24 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext John Holmblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Kalle, Hi John, > thanks for the response,and yes, after another day of work with the > upgraded OS on the N800 I concluded that the N800 was low on battery > as a result of either > > a) the unit was not fully charged to begin with, or > > b) fo

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-24 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Frederic Crozat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Kalle Valo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> This is getting difficult. So if your ADSL line is dead for a day your >> WLAN AP will not work, did I understand this right? If yes, that sucks >> big time. > > Only if

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-24 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Andrew Daviel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I opened a ticket with Proxim. Very good, thanks. > They suggest turning off SSID broadcast and see if that reduces the > battery use. Sounds like b/s to me, but I may be wrong. Yes, that has nothing to do with your problem. > If I try that at

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-24 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Andrew Daviel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lots of detail I don't understand. I can see the beacon interval on > the Proxim APs is 100ms (same as the Linksys default), and see the > DTIM info (whether data is being held). > > IEEE 802.11 Beacon frame, Flags: > Type/Subtype: Bea

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-23 Thread John Holmblad
Andrew, after thinking about Kalle's explanation of PSM, and as the owner of a UTStarcom Windows Mobile handset (Verizon Wireless XV6700) that supports both EVDO and 802.11b, I have to conclude that, The UTS XV6700 does not do a satisfactory job with respect to PSM. My conclusion here is based

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-23 Thread Frederic Crozat
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Kalle Valo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "ext Frederic Crozat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> But what I could do is to analyse the problem myself. It would take >>> only an hour or two, including writing a small report about the >>> problem which I can send every

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-23 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Andrew Daviel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Excellent writeup, thanks :-) You welcome. > So, what devices apart from the Nokia tablets use PSM ? Nokia phones (N95, N81 etc) use WLAN PSM. They might even have more aggressive PSM tablets have. > iPhone ? I once (like a year ago) played w

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-23 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Frederic Crozat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Why is PSM so fragile then? Since I can't sleep (jet lag, argh), I'll >> write a bit about this. > > > > wow, thanks for the detail explanations. I kind of better understand > PSM issues. Excellent. >>> A first bug was found in ralink proprie

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-23 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext John Holmblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Kalle. Hi John, > thanks for sharing your deep, if sleep deprived, insights re 802.11 > power management. I'm glad that it was helpful. > I have read them out of both general interest in the workings of > 802.11 but also as a result of the fac

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-23 Thread Andrew Daviel
I opened a ticket with Proxim. They suggest turning off SSID broadcast and see if that reduces the battery use. Sounds like b/s to me, but I may be wrong. If I try that at home, I have to mark the connection as "hidden" otherwise I can't select it to connect to, and I suspect it would annoy p

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-22 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Andrew Daviel wrote: > Is there anything for the tablets that can log wireless traffic in enough > detail to show whether PSM is working ? airodump-ng ?? Should have tried before posting. I have a couple of capture files made with airodump-ng --beacons, which I can view in wi

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-21 Thread Andrew Daviel
Excellent writeup, thanks :-) So, what devices apart from the Nokia tablets use PSM ? iPhone ? Palm ? Windows Mobile devices like the UTstarcom PocketPC ? I opened a ticket with Proxim; not sure if our contract includes support but maybe I'll get a reply. Is there anything for the tablets th

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-21 Thread Frederic Crozat
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Kalle Valo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "ext Frederic Crozat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> What power-management issues have you seen affecting battery life ? >> >> I think it is usually caused by interoperability deficiency between >> 770/n8x0 and some router

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-21 Thread John Holmblad
Kalle. thanks for sharing your deep, if sleep deprived, insights re 802.11 power management. I have read them out of both general interest in the workings of 802.11 but also as a result of the fact that just this weekend I upgraded my N800 to OS2008 (~20 minutes-yeah) and reinstalled/upgraded

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-21 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Andrew Daviel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Kalle Valo wrote: > >>> I recently noticed that my tablet battery runs down faster at work than >>> at home, with the WiFi enabled but otherwise sitting idle (12%/hour vs >>> 1%/hour). >> >> What do you mean by 12%/hour? That t

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-21 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Frederic Crozat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What power-management issues have you seen affecting battery life ? > > I think it is usually caused by interoperability deficiency between > 770/n8x0 and some routers wifi chipset regarding PSM (Power Saving > Management) part of wifi specifica

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-21 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Kalle Valo wrote: >> I recently noticed that my tablet battery runs down faster at work than >> at home, with the WiFi enabled but otherwise sitting idle (12%/hour vs >> 1%/hour). > > What do you mean by 12%/hour? That the battery will run out in eight > hours? I guess. I was

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-21 Thread Kalle Valo
"ext Andrew Daviel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Eero Tamminen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> One possibility is a WLAN AP with broken power management > > I recently noticed that my tablet battery runs down faster at work than > at home, with the WiFi enabled

Re: Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-20 Thread Frederic Crozat
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Andrew Daviel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Eero Tamminen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> One possibility is a WLAN AP with broken power management > > I recently noticed that my tablet battery runs down faster at work than > at h

Power consumption and WLAN APs

2008-07-20 Thread Andrew Daviel
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Eero Tamminen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One possibility is a WLAN AP with broken power management I recently noticed that my tablet battery runs down faster at work than at home, with the WiFi enabled but otherwise sitting idle (12%/hour vs 1%/hour). I tho