When marking a bug as a duplicate, bugzilla insists that a comment be
added. This seems redundant since bugzilla itself adds an explanatory
comment automatically.
Is it possible to make an exception in this case, to the requirement to
add a comment when changing the status of a bug?
Jim
Hi there
If you look for packages to be uploaded, please have a look on new
package request search in Bugzilla. We still have there nearly 30
opened requests. Of course if you think we should not have it in
repository explain it.
Cheers
--
Anne
http://www.mageia.org
On 8 April 2011 12:05, Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org wrote:
If you look for packages to be uploaded, please have a look on new
package request search in Bugzilla. We still have there nearly 30
opened requests. Of course if you think we should not have it in
repository explain it.
A link is
On 8 April 2011 12:52, Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
If you look for packages to be uploaded, please have a look on new
package request search in Bugzilla. We still have there nearly 30
opened requests. Of course if you think we should not have it in
repository explain it.
On 8 April 2011 10:06, James Kerr j...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk wrote:
When marking a bug as a duplicate, bugzilla insists that a comment be added.
This seems redundant since bugzilla itself adds an explanatory comment
automatically.
Is it possible to make an exception in this case, to
Hi,
yesterday I had the bright idea to import vdr into Mageia, since I do
use it at home.
But it turns out, it is a bit much for me, meaning, building vdr
packages is quite some complicated stuff, when I try and read the lmost
800 line spec file.
So it would be nice if someone (Funda, you
For a while cryptsetup-luks existed in the repos, it was mistakenly
imported from Fedora (different names so the packager who imported it
didn't notice) while Mageia already has cryptsetup.
Since this issue only happened in Cauldron, cryptsetup won't obsolete
cryptsetup-luks and you need to fix
On 8 April 2011 16:05, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'd like to ask you, what you think, we should do?
- package mariadb as an alternative for mysql
- package mariadb nd drop mysql or
- stay with mysql and not package mariadb at all at least for the time
being
By the way,
On Friday 08 April 2011, Ahmad Samir wrote:
About option 2, can't be dropped at the moment, as e.g. Amarok requires it.
Provides: mysql-foo ?
--
Say NO to spam and viruses. Stop using Microsoft Windows!
Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com schrieb am 08.04.2011
On 8 April 2011 16:05, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'd like to ask you, what you think, we should do?
- package mariadb as an alternative for mysql
- package mariadb nd drop mysql or
- stay with mysql and
On 8 April 2011 16:12, P. Christeas p_chr...@hol.gr wrote:
On Friday 08 April 2011, Ahmad Samir wrote:
About option 2, can't be dropped at the moment, as e.g. Amarok requires it.
Provides: mysql-foo ?
--
Say NO to spam and viruses. Stop using Microsoft Windows!
Honestly
--
Ahmad
08.04.2011 17:22, Ahmad Samir kirjutas:
On 8 April 2011 16:20, Oliver Burger oliver@googlemail.com wrote:
Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com schrieb am 08.04.2011
On 8 April 2011 16:05, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'd like to ask you, what you think, we should do?
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011, Oliver Burger wrote:
So I'd like to ask you, what you think, we should do?
- package mariadb as an alternative for mysql
- package mariadb nd drop mysql or
- stay with mysql and not package mariadb at all at least for the time
being
I would start with mariadb as an
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:50 PM, nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011, Oliver Burger wrote:
So I'd like to ask you, what you think, we should do?
- package mariadb as an alternative for mysql
- package mariadb nd drop mysql or
- stay with mysql and not package
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011, Dexter Morgan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:50 PM, nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011, Oliver Burger wrote:
So I'd like to ask you, what you think, we should do?
- package mariadb as an alternative for mysql
- package mariadb nd
nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org schrieb am 08.04.2011
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011, Dexter Morgan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:50 PM, nicolas vigier boklm@mars-
attacks.org wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011, Oliver Burger wrote:
So I'd like to ask you, what you think, we should do?
- package
On 8 April 2011 15:54, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
I mistakenly updated gvfs to 1.7.x about two weeks ago. It turns out,
gvfs 1.6.x is the branch that's more suitable for GNOME 2.32.
I've reverted to 1.6.x in svn, and submitted the new package, but
you'll have to revert
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:52:06 -0400, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8 April 2011 15:54, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
Make sure gvfs-1.6.7 is on the mirror your system is using, by looking
at the output of 'urpmq -fy gvfs', then:
# rpm -e --nodes $(rpm -qa *gvfs*
On 9 April 2011 02:25, David W. Hodgins davidwhodg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:52:06 -0400, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8 April 2011 15:54, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
Make sure gvfs-1.6.7 is on the mirror your system is using, by looking
at
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:14:28 -0400, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com
wrote:
As Frank said, mirror lag, ibiblio.org syncs once a day (and I repeat
the question pterjan asked on IRC, why is it a primary mirror?).
I edited /var/cache/urpmi/mirrors.cache
and replace ibiblio.org with
On 9 April 2011 05:41, David W. Hodgins davidwhodg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:14:28 -0400, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com
wrote:
As Frank said, mirror lag, ibiblio.org syncs once a day (and I repeat
the question pterjan asked on IRC, why is it a primary mirror?).
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
