On 31.05.2011 06:13, Tux99 wrote:
> Is there any specific reason (regressions, incompatibilites?) why Mageia
> (and Mandriva) still ships dkms 2.0.19 even though 2.1.1.2 is the latest
> upstream release, or is it simply because nobody has updated the package?
It has lots of customizations (=patche
I thought the core build of freetype2 already has the bytecode interpreter
enabled (since the patent expired).
Why is there still a need for a tainted version?
--
Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
Is there any specific reason (regressions, incompatibilites?) why Mageia
(and Mandriva) still ships dkms 2.0.19 even though 2.1.1.2 is the latest
upstream release, or is it simply because nobody has updated the package?
--
Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
freetype2 didn't get a tainted build yet; I've committed the changes
in SVN; not sure if there's still time to submit it, but ideally it
wouldn't affect the release ISO's as they'll only have the non-tainted
freetype2 build.
--
Ahmad Samir
2011/5/31 JA Magallón :
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:18:54 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>
>> mån 2011-05-30 klockan 23:15 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund:
>>
>> That should be:
>> mageia-release-common-1-2.mga1
>> mageia-release-Default-1.2.mga1
>>
>
> Well, as I did not update today until late at night
On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:18:54 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> mån 2011-05-30 klockan 23:15 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund:
>
> That should be:
> mageia-release-common-1-2.mga1
> mageia-release-Default-1.2.mga1
>
Well, as I did not update today until late at night (spain timezone), I jumped
directl
Le 30/05/2011 22:34, Daniel Le Berre a écrit :
> Le 30/05/2011 22:18, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
>> mån 2011-05-30 klockan 23:15 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund:
>>> mån 2011-05-30 klockan 22:39 +0300 skrev Daniel Le Berre:
Le 30/05/2011 19:55, Michael Scherer a écrit :
>
> We should have w
Le 30/05/2011 22:18, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
> mån 2011-05-30 klockan 23:15 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund:
>> mån 2011-05-30 klockan 22:39 +0300 skrev Daniel Le Berre:
>>> Le 30/05/2011 19:55, Michael Scherer a écrit :
We should have waited before uploading this rpm.
People bei
mån 2011-05-30 klockan 23:15 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund:
> mån 2011-05-30 klockan 22:39 +0300 skrev Daniel Le Berre:
> > Le 30/05/2011 19:55, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> > >
> > > We should have waited before uploading this rpm.
> > >
> > > People being upgraded to stable is a demand from users
mån 2011-05-30 klockan 22:39 +0300 skrev Daniel Le Berre:
> Le 30/05/2011 19:55, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> >
> > We should have waited before uploading this rpm.
> >
> > People being upgraded to stable is a demand from users ( see -discuss ),
> > and that would have been saner to wait at least
Le 30/05/2011 19:55, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> Le lundi 30 mai 2011 à 18:42 +0200, nicolas vigier a écrit :
>> On Mon, 30 May 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as we have uploaded the new version of mageia-release, some of you may
>>> have seen that urpmi sources have been changed t
Le lundi 30 mai 2011 à 18:42 +0200, nicolas vigier a écrit :
> On Mon, 30 May 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > as we have uploaded the new version of mageia-release, some of you may
> > have seen that urpmi sources have been changed to use
> > distrib/1/ instead of distrib/cauldron
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as we have uploaded the new version of mageia-release, some of you may
> have seen that urpmi sources have been changed to use
> distrib/1/ instead of distrib/cauldron/ , especially if you didn't touch
> to the default configuration.
>
> Not
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 13:08, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> root-odjjhxpcy38dnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org skrev 30.5.2011 14:44:
>>
>> Revision
>> 1601
>> Author
>> pterjan
>> Date
>> 2011-05-30 13:44:17 +0200 (Mon, 30 May 2011)
>>
>>
>> Log Message
>>
>> Do not append .%distro_section if
Hi,
as we have uploaded the new version of mageia-release, some of you may
have seen that urpmi sources have been changed to use
distrib/1/ instead of distrib/cauldron/ , especially if you didn't touch
to the default configuration.
Not all mirrors are in sync, and in fact, most are not proposing
root-odjjhxpcy38dnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org skrev 30.5.2011 14:44:
Revision
1601
Author
pterjan
Date
2011-05-30 13:44:17 +0200 (Mon, 30 May 2011)
Log Message
Do not append .%distro_section if section is core
[...]
Modified: rpm/rpm-setup/trunk/build.macros.in
=
hi,
after release, there are a lot of perl modules to be updated (at least
196 regular modules according to magpie).
however, please refrain from updating them: i'd like first to update
perl to 5.14.0, which is binary incompatible with perl 5.12.3.
therefore, updating perl modules after 5.14 migr
17 matches
Mail list logo
