Hi,
after some discussion in the German forums, I saw, that there are
discrepancies between /etc/version and /etc/release, both coming from
the mageia-release-common-1-2.mga1 package.
While /etc/release calls my system
--
Mageia release 1 (Official) for i586
--
it is called
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011, Oliver Burger wrote:
Hi,
after some discussion in the German forums, I saw, that there are
discrepancies between /etc/version and /etc/release, both coming from
the mageia-release-common-1-2.mga1 package.
While /etc/release calls my system
--
Mageia
Hi there
Now that release is out, let restart our weekly meetings on #mageia-dev at
19h UTC.
Here are the topics:
- short review of Mageia 1 launch
- organize post-portem for packagers team
- start brainstorm on release cycle
- relaunch mentoring
As usual feel free to comment or propose any
Hi there
We have some stuff to complete here:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=securityCan we spend the 2 or 3 coming
days to finalize it and start updates submits?
Cheers
--
Anne
http://www.mageia.org
Hi Matteo,
can you please answer to mailing list instead to the sender,
other people can hardly follow the thread otherwise :)
Thanks
Angelo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 08/06/11 08:42, Oliver Burger wrote:
Hi,
after some discussion in the German forums, I saw, that there are
discrepancies between /etc/version and /etc/release, both coming from
the mageia-release-common-1-2.mga1 package.
While /etc/release calls my system
--
Mageia release 1
2011/6/8 Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org
Hi there
Now that release is out, let restart our weekly meetings on #mageia-dev at
19h UTC.
Here are the topics:
- short review of Mageia 1 launch
- organize post-portem for packagers team
- start brainstorm on release cycle
- relaunch mentoring
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
We have some stuff to complete here:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=securityCan we spend the 2 or 3 coming
days to finalize it and start updates submits?
Pascal is
On 8 June 2011 18:44, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
We have some stuff to complete here:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=securityCan we spend the 2 or 3 coming
days
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
We have some stuff to complete here:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=securityCan we spend the 2 or 3 coming
days to finalize it
On 8 June 2011 19:39, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 June 2011 18:57, Christiaan Welvaart c...@daneel.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
We have some stuff to complete here:
On 8 June 2011 14:10, James Kerr j...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk wrote:
On 08/06/11 08:42, Oliver Burger wrote:
Hi,
after some discussion in the German forums, I saw, that there are
discrepancies between /etc/version and /etc/release, both coming from
the mageia-release-common-1-2.mga1
Le mercredi 8 juin 2011 19:39:55, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
IMHO, rejection reasons:
- The sec team doesn't think the update fixes a serious security
vulnerability; so it's not updates but backports
What about bugfix updates ? I guess fixing a bug is a valid reason for an
update, like it was in
On 8 June 2011 21:45, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Le mercredi 8 juin 2011 19:39:55, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
IMHO, rejection reasons:
- The sec team doesn't think the update fixes a serious security
vulnerability; so it's not updates but backports
What about bugfix updates ?
after 6 month of pausing this topic I would like to reactivate it.
Now that release 1 is out it might be woth for further toughts and a
lot of fun work :)
http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=soundstudio
I didn't rest thinking on this idea:
my latest idea is to mame a bash-script with dialog
Le mercredi 8 juin 2011 22:28:30, Sascha Schneider a écrit :
my latest idea is to mame a bash-script with dialog to configure
proaudio on mageia.
What do you mean by 'configure proaudio'?
I think the only needed thing is pasuspender jackd to use proaudio tools.
Hi Jose,
I meant .. configure mageia to use this distro for professional
audio stuff, like ardour, qtractor, qmidiarp
2011/6/8 José Jorge jjo...@free.fr:
Le mercredi 8 juin 2011 22:28:30, Sascha Schneider a écrit :
my latest idea is to mame a bash-script with dialog to configure
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 19:48 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 8 June 2011 18:44, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
We have some stuff to complete here:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security
On 06/08/2011 05:31 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 19:48 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 8 June 2011 18:44, Michael Schererm...@zarb.org wrote:
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
We have some stuff to complete here:
On 8 June 2011 23:38, Stew Benedict stewbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/08/2011 05:31 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 19:48 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 8 June 2011 18:44, Michael Schererm...@zarb.org wrote:
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit
On 8 June 2011 23:40, Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@iki.fi wrote:
On 08.06.2011 23:23, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 8 June 2011 21:45, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Le mercredi 8 juin 2011 19:39:55, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
IMHO, rejection reasons:
- The sec team doesn't think the update
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 20:39 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 8 June 2011 18:57, Christiaan Welvaart c...@daneel.dyndns.org wrote:
So who decides to reject an update and at what point? According to your
proposal, either QA people decide this or they waste time on updates that
later get
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 18:57 +0200, Christiaan Welvaart a écrit :
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
We have some stuff to complete here:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 00:53 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 8 June 2011 23:40, Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@iki.fi wrote:
On 08.06.2011 23:23, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 8 June 2011 21:45, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Le mercredi 8 juin 2011 19:39:55, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 9 June 2011 01:25, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 00:53 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 8 June 2011 23:40, Anssi Hannula anssi.hann...@iki.fi wrote:
On 08.06.2011 23:23, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 8 June 2011 21:45, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Le
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Sascha Schneider wrote:
Now that release 1 is out it might be woth for further toughts and a
lot of fun work :)
http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=soundstudio
I didn't rest thinking on this idea:
my latest idea is to mame a bash-script with dialog to configure
proaudio
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 02:40 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
Yes, but I was talking about the actual submitting to */release, not
fixing the package itself. IIUC the submission rights will be
restricted to the Sec team.
Sorry to be picky, but there is no submit to */release, it is frozen.
And
Le mercredi 8 juin 2011 21:48:25, vous avez écrit :
Revision: 102171
Author: ze
Date: 2011-06-09 02:48:25 +0200 (Thu, 09 Jun 2011)
Log Message:
---
- add dependency needed by kgamma build
- add missing versioning in main package require
Modified Paths:
--
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 00:46 did gyre and
gimble:
For example instead of adding lines to rc.local a new soundstudio
initscript can be installed.
As we'll be switching to systemd, an initscript is probably not the way
to go. A systemd unit however would be good :D
Le mercredi 8 juin 2011 16:52:16, Mageia Team a écrit :
Name: libgdata Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 0.7.1 Vendor: Mageia.Org
[...]
dmorgan dmorgan 0.7.1-1.mga2:
+ Revision: 102030
- New version 0.7.1
There's a file
On 8 June 2011 09:20, Mageia Team buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote:
Name : libcanberra Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 0.27 Vendor: Mageia.Org
Release : 2.mga2 Build Date: Wed Jun 8 09:16:17
2011
On 09.06.2011 02:25, Michael Scherer wrote:
I guess we can start with a list of exception :
- stuff that should be updated to latest version, because the security
support for older releases ( firefox, chrome ) is too hard
- we update to latest version if there is no regression and a strong
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 05:47 +0200, Bruno Cornec wrote:
Vasiliy G Tolstov said on Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:26:35PM +0400:
Thank's for answer. Very well. If i use basesystem-minimal and append
grub systemd ntpd openssh-server and kernel, does that system can
boot-up ?
You may want to look
33 matches
Mail list logo
