07.01.2012 01:09, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
On Friday 06 January 2012 18:54, Balcaen John wrote:
I guess when you did encounter that you just remove task-kde from your system
I did not. I should have been more clearly with my example. :-)=
The packages in my example where all console program,
Le 06/01/2012 17:55, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
'Twas brillig, and Robert Fox at 06/01/12 10:16 did gyre and gimble:
After latest Cauldron updates, I got a real long list of suggested
orphans - but I believe some of these packages are needed (like hal or
basesystem-minimal) -
How do I clear out
Sander Lepik a écrit :
07.01.2012 01:09, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
On Friday 06 January 2012 18:54, Balcaen John wrote:
I guess when you did encounter that you just remove task-kde from
your system
I did not. I should have been more clearly with my example. :-)=
The packages in my example
Le 07/01/2012 11:18, andre999 a écrit :
Sander Lepik a écrit :
07.01.2012 01:09, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
On Friday 06 January 2012 18:54, Balcaen John wrote:
I guess when you did encounter that you just remove task-kde from
your system
I did not. I should have been more clearly with my
07.01.2012 12:18, andre999 kirjutas:
It is not exactly the same thing, but in more than one occasion when I installed packages
with similar functions at the same time, to compare them, say A, B, and C, and later
uninstalled B and C, I have found A to be declared an orphan. Only to find that it
2012/1/7 andre999 andre999...@laposte.net:
Sander Lepik a écrit :
07.01.2012 01:09, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
On Friday 06 January 2012 18:54, Balcaen John wrote:
I guess when you did encounter that you just remove task-kde from your
system
I did not. I should have been more clearly with
07.01.2012 09:18, LinuxBSDos.com skrev:
True that the user does not and should not care about definitions of an
orphan, but also, the user should not be put in a situation where he/she
will have to go hunting for what could or could not break anything.
Well urpme is not at fault. It's doing
2012/1/7 Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org:
07.01.2012 09:18, LinuxBSDos.com skrev:
True that the user does not and should not care about definitions of an
orphan, but also, the user should not be put in a situation where he/she
will have to go hunting for what could or could not break
2012/1/7 Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com:
Of course this is one way to find bugs in packages. But what about the
documented (in German) case where
Sorry, documented is not the correct word. I could not document it
with logs or namng of files. I only stated what I did and what it
07.01.2012 13:39, Wolfgang Bornath kirjutas:
Of course this is one way to find bugs in packages. But what about the
documented (in German) case where
- after fresh installation, reboot (ok) and updates right after
installation I was presented with a list of more than 100 orphans.
- I ran
On Saturday 07 January 2012 09:42, Sander Lepik wrote:
Give us command line example. Install something and remove it and then show
me what got
orphaned if it wasn't orphan before. What you claim here doesn't sound right
as i haven't
seen it myself.
I'll do that next time I come across
Sander Lepik a écrit :
07.01.2012 12:18, andre999 kirjutas:
It is not exactly the same thing, but in more than one occasion when
I installed packages with similar functions at the same time, to
compare them, say A, B, and C, and later uninstalled B and C, I have
found A to be declared an
Hi,
In Mandriva I was using this command to make proper attribution of imported
.spec files:
$ mdvsys import foo.src.rpm --message 'this spec file is imported from Fedora
where it was written by X'
I'm trying to make the equivalent with this command:
$ mgarepo putsrpm -m this spec file is
Hi all,
please do have a look at the alpha3 release notes:
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mageia_2_alpha3 and fix/complete them. By
keeping them up to date during the alpha/beta/rc phases we will
finally have some nice release notes for Mageia2.
It really only takes a few minutes for everyone...
Le 07/01/2012 13:23, Florent Monnier a écrit :
Hi,
In Mandriva I was using this command to make proper attribution of imported
.spec files:
$ mdvsys import foo.src.rpm --message 'this spec file is imported from Fedora
where it was written by X'
I'm trying to make the equivalent with this
Op zaterdag 07 januari 2012 13:40:44 schreef Oliver Burger:
Hi all,
please do have a look at the alpha3 release notes:
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mageia_2_alpha3 and fix/complete them. By
keeping them up to date during the alpha/beta/rc phases we will
finally have some nice release notes
Op zaterdag 07 januari 2012 13:23:10 schreef Florent Monnier:
Hi,
In Mandriva I was using this command to make proper attribution of imported
.spec files:
$ mdvsys import foo.src.rpm --message 'this spec file is imported from
Fedora where it was written by X'
I'm trying to make the
Maarten Vanraes skrev 7.1.2012 15:34:
Op zaterdag 07 januari 2012 13:40:44 schreef Oliver Burger:
Hi all,
please do have a look at the alpha3 release notes:
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mageia_2_alpha3 and fix/complete them. By
keeping them up to date during the alpha/beta/rc phases we will
Le samedi 07 janvier 2012 13:58:05, Luc Menut a écrit :
Le 07/01/2012 13:23, Florent Monnier a écrit :
Hi,
In Mandriva I was using this command to make proper attribution of
imported .spec files:
$ mdvsys import foo.src.rpm --message 'this spec file is imported from
Fedora where
2012/1/7 Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee:
07.01.2012 13:39, Wolfgang Bornath kirjutas:
Of course this is one way to find bugs in packages. But what about the
documented (in German) case where
- after fresh installation, reboot (ok) and updates right after
installation I was presented
07.01.2012 16:24, Wolfgang Bornath kirjutas:
Used the full DVD (32-bit) Mageia 2 Alpha 2
- minimal install with X
How? AFAIK this is not one of the default options.
--
Sander
2012/1/7 Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee:
07.01.2012 16:24, Wolfgang Bornath kirjutas:
Used the full DVD (32-bit) Mageia 2 Alpha 2
- minimal install with X
How? AFAIK this is not one of the default options.
It is.
1. Select Custom at the DE selection
2. Unmark all package groups
3. Up
07.01.2012 17:09, Wolfgang Bornath kirjutas:
2012/1/7 Sander Lepiksander.le...@eesti.ee:
07.01.2012 16:24, Wolfgang Bornath kirjutas:
Used the full DVD (32-bit) Mageia 2 Alpha 2
- minimal install with X
How? AFAIK this is not one of the default options.
It is.
1. Select Custom at the DE
2012/1/7 Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org:
Maarten Vanraes skrev 7.1.2012 15:34:
i updated https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mageia_2_alpha3#Databases
is this sort of what you want? or is it too much?
I would replace an as of yet unreleased MariaDB 5.5.18
with MariaDB 5.5.18 prerelease
I rewrote
After a reboot the I get an Error 18 message telling me that the Selected
Cylinder exceeds the maximum supported by the bios.
I then assumed that the new kernel must be crap and tried to use the previous
kernel and got the same error message.
My system is a bit odd that the bios sees the
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
2012/1/5 Buchan Milne bgmi...@zarb.org:
-Possibly considering contacting large mirror sites (e.g. mirrors.kernel.org)
who currently mirror Mandriva, but not Mageia?
Just for the records: mirrors.kernel.org mirror Mageia.
But surely there are more large sites to be
Glen Ogilvie wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 January 2012 23:56:01 Romain d'Alverny wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 22:36, Johnny A. Solbu coo...@solbu.net wrote:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 21:06, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
wiki.mandriva.com may be shut down for good in just a few days
What?
On 07/01/12 15:30, Sander Lepik wrote:
07.01.2012 17:09, Wolfgang Bornath kirjutas:
2012/1/7 Sander Lepiksander.le...@eesti.ee:
07.01.2012 16:24, Wolfgang Bornath kirjutas:
Used the full DVD (32-bit) Mageia 2 Alpha 2
- minimal install with X
How? AFAIK this is not one of the default
On Friday, January 06, 2012 12:57:39 PM Sander Lepik wrote:
06.01.2012 21:06, Dale Huckeby kirjutas:
Evidently once I've installed package A which requests X, sometimes
packages F, L, and T might subsequently get installed which also need X
*and presumably would have requested it had it not
Hi there,
let me welcome Kamil Rytarowski - Mageia login name kamil - as a full
Mageia packager.
In the time I had the pleasure to mentor him, I got to know him as a
dedicated and alert person showing me from time to time that I should
read the packaging policies from time to time.
So Kamil,
Am 16.04.2011 16:05, schrieb Christiaan Welvaart:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
I just downloaded the latest Seamonkey 2.0.12 SRPM from Mandriva cooker and
rebuilt it on my Mageia VM and it built flawlessly, I only had to remove
all the obsolete %if %mdkversion sections, but all
07.01.2012 17:09, Wolfgang Bornath skrev:
2012/1/7 Sander Lepiksander.le...@eesti.ee:
07.01.2012 16:24, Wolfgang Bornath kirjutas:
Used the full DVD (32-bit) Mageia 2 Alpha 2
- minimal install with X
How? AFAIK this is not one of the default options.
It is.
1. Select Custom at the DE
W dniu 07.01.2012 18:24, Oliver Burger pisze:
Hi there,
let me welcome Kamil Rytarowski - Mageia login name kamil - as a full
Mageia packager.
In the time I had the pleasure to mentor him, I got to know him as a
dedicated and alert person showing me from time to time that I should
read the
Op zaterdag 07 januari 2012 17:48:36 schreef Thomas Spuhler:
[...]
It seems to me, auto-orphans gives more headaches than benefits. Why are we
clinching to it?
because it works for me (and several others)
Le 08/01/2012 02:01, r...@mageia.org a écrit :
Revision
193033
Author
dmorgan
Date
2012-01-08 02:01:07 +0100 (Sun, 08 Jan 2012)
Log Message
Suggests sectools instead of a Requires ( mga # 2808)
Modified Paths
* updates/1/msec/current/SPECS/msec.spec
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Oliver Burger oliver@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
please do have a look at the alpha3 release notes:
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mageia_2_alpha3 and fix/complete them. By
keeping them up to date during the alpha/beta/rc phases we will
finally have some
36 matches
Mail list logo
