'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Thierry Vignaud
thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 September 2012 16:11, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 5642
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, there are some builds that get a strangely reported build
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com
On 4 September 2012 16:11, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue, 04 Sep 2012)
Log Message
skip packages with no name
Is that possible?
Modified: build_system/web/test_index.php
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Thierry Vignaud
thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 September 2012 16:11, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue, 04 Sep 2012)
Log Message
skip packages with no name
Is that possible?
Well, I am guilty of not
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny rdalve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Thierry Vignaud
thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 September 2012 16:11, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue, 04 Sep 2012)
Log
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 18:52, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
By the way, there are some builds that get a strangely reported build
duration (15588 days)
$ LC_ALL=C date --date '-15588 days'
Wed Dec 31 18:25:48 CET 1969
Now That would be a loong build time, it it weren't wrong. :-)=
--
Johnny
