Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 10 June 2011 13:44, Wolfgang Bornathmolc...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/6/10 Michael Schererm...@zarb.org:
We have used backports in the past for that, and I see no reason to
change that.
If the problem is that backports were too buggy in the past, then we
should
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
We can agree that everybody want something newer for some rpms, but few
people want everything to be newer ( ie, now one run backports as a
update media, I think ). So as much as I am against asking to users
questions, we must show them the choice
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 12:06:55, Christiaan Welvaart a écrit :
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
We can agree that everybody want something newer for some rpms, but few
people want everything to be newer ( ie, now one run backports as a
update media, I think ). So as much as I am
Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 13:14:29 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 12:06:55, Christiaan Welvaart a écrit :
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
We can agree that everybody want something newer for some rpms, but few
people want everything to be newer ( ie, now one
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 14:26:19, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 13:14:29 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 12:06:55, Christiaan Welvaart a écrit :
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
We can agree that everybody want something newer for some
Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 16:55:00 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 14:26:19, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 13:14:29 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 12:06:55, Christiaan Welvaart a écrit :
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 18:01:54, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 16:55:00 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 14:26:19, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 13:14:29 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 12:06:55, Christiaan
Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 18:01:54, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 16:55:00 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
Le samedi 11 juin 2011 14:26:19, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op zaterdag 11 juni 2011 13:14:29 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
Le samedi 11
'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 09/06/11 17:42 did gyre and gimble:
On 9 June 2011 14:22, Oliver Burger oliver@googlemail.com wrote:
Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com schrieb am 09.06.2011
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie
wrote:
I think updates
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 10:56:35, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 09/06/11 17:42 did gyre and gimble:
On 9 June 2011 14:22, Oliver Burger oliver@googlemail.com wrote:
Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com schrieb am 09.06.2011
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM,
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:14 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
Hi,
As I upgrade my various machines (I only really have about 5, so not
that many) I'm running into a few packages that are missing (this is
inevitable).
Nothing major just little things like trac and supybot etc.
What is
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 09:56 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 09/06/11 17:42 did gyre and gimble:
But if new package can go directly to updates.. that doesn't look
right to me, because at which point will new packages stop going to
a stable release
'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 10/06/11 11:29 did gyre and gimble:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 09:56 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 09/06/11 17:42 did gyre and gimble:
But if new package can go directly to updates.. that doesn't look
right to me,
'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 10/06/11 11:27 did gyre and gimble:
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:14 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
Hi,
As I upgrade my various machines (I only really have about 5, so not
that many) I'm running into a few packages that are missing (this is
inevitable).
[Didn't finish this sentence]
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 10/06/11 11:44 did gyre and gimble:
I don't think this is particularly relevant. Backports are unsupported
generally. That's a given. If we encourage people to enable backports to
get missing packages (this is very distinct and
2011/6/10 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
We have used backports in the past for that, and I see no reason to
change that.
If the problem is that backports were too buggy in the past, then we
should fix backports process, not bypassing them.
And if we start by pushing new version in update,
Wolfgang Bornath skrev 10.6.2011 14:44:
2011/6/10 Michael Schererm...@zarb.org:
We have used backports in the past for that, and I see no reason to
change that.
If the problem is that backports were too buggy in the past, then we
should fix backports process, not bypassing them.
And if we
Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing - */updates _if_ we
decide that's the way to go...
As I see it, it's the only user friendly way. Using backports is fine
for experienced users who do know what to install from backports or
who are
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 11:44 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 10/06/11 11:27 did gyre and gimble:
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:14 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
Hi,
As I upgrade my various machines (I only really have about 5, so not
that many) I'm
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing - */updates _if_ we
decide that's the way to go...
As I see it, it's the only user friendly way. Using backports is fine
for
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlundt...@mageia.org schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing - */updates _if_ we
decide that's the way to go...
As I see it, it's the only user
On 10/06/11 15:09, James Kerr wrote:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlundt...@mageia.org schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing - */updates _if_ we
decide that's the way to go...
James Kerr j...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk schrieb am 10.06.2011
Even though backports are disabled rpmdrake can display a list of
available backports. (The sources are automatically updated by
mgaonline.)
I make you parden, but: no!
When a repo is disabled it doesn't get updated
On 10/06/11 15:27, Oliver Burger wrote:
James Kerrj...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk schrieb am 10.06.2011
Even though backports are disabled rpmdrake can display a list of
available backports. (The sources are automatically updated by
mgaonline.)
I make you parden, but: no!
When a repo is
'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 10/06/11 13:51 did gyre and gimble:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 11:44 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
So the user that just wants to install supybot has to expose themselves
to the risk of updating to a backported version of gnome or KDE this
is hardly
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 16:27 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
James Kerr j...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk schrieb am 10.06.2011
Even though backports are disabled rpmdrake can display a list of
available backports. (The sources are automatically updated by
mgaonline.)
I make you parden,
Op vrijdag 10 juni 2011 17:18:54 schreef Michael Scherer:
[...]
UI wise, I think it would make sense to have that ( even if a idea is
not sufficient, and we need a patch ) :
User search for a package, he should see the latest recommended version
( ie, release/updates ).
If he say also
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
release is obviously frozen so no go there.
The only real option is updates, but that should obviously have some QA
on it.
Updates is not for new version of software, not for new softwares. And
backporting something from cauldron is not a
On 10 June 2011 16:46, James Kerr j...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk wrote:
On 10/06/11 15:27, Oliver Burger wrote:
James Kerrj...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk schrieb am 10.06.2011
Even though backports are disabled rpmdrake can display a list of
available backports. (The sources are
On 10.06.2011 17:28, Thorsten van Lil wrote:
Am 10.06.2011 16:09, schrieb James Kerr:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlundt...@mageia.org schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing -
On 10 June 2011 13:44, Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/6/10 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
We have used backports in the past for that, and I see no reason to
change that.
If the problem is that backports were too buggy in the past, then we
should fix backports process,
James Kerr a écrit :
On 10/06/11 15:09, James Kerr wrote:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlundt...@mageia.org schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing - */updates _if_ we
decide
On 10/06/11 22:44, andre999 wrote:
James Kerr a écrit :
On 10/06/11 15:09, James Kerr wrote:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlundt...@mageia.org schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be
James Kerr a écrit :
On 10/06/11 22:44, andre999 wrote:
James Kerr a écrit :
On 10/06/11 15:09, James Kerr wrote:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlundt...@mageia.org schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path
Hi,
As I upgrade my various machines (I only really have about 5, so not
that many) I'm running into a few packages that are missing (this is
inevitable).
Nothing major just little things like trac and supybot etc.
What is the best way to add these packages to the v1 tree?
Using backports
Op donderdag 09 juni 2011 11:14:21 schreef Colin Guthrie:
Hi,
As I upgrade my various machines (I only really have about 5, so not
that many) I'm running into a few packages that are missing (this is
inevitable).
Nothing major just little things like trac and supybot etc.
What is the
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
otoh, perhaps a missing package is also a bugfix... maybe we could file bug
reports for missing packages and go through the updates route...
Filing bug reports is not a bad idea, even if the new package will go to
backports. Just explain a little
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 10:40 did gyre and
gimble:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
otoh, perhaps a missing package is also a bugfix... maybe we could
file bug
reports for missing packages and go through the updates route...
Filing bug reports is not a
2011/6/9 Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie:
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 10:40 did gyre and
gimble:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
otoh, perhaps a missing package is also a bugfix... maybe we could
file bug
reports for missing packages and go through the
'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 11:03 did gyre and gimble:
2011/6/9 Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie:
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 10:40 did gyre and
gimble:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
otoh, perhaps a missing package is also a
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 10:40 did gyre and
gimble:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
otoh, perhaps a missing package is also a bugfix... maybe we could
file bug
reports for
09.06.2011 15:13, Dexter Morgan kirjutas:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Colin Guthriemag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 10:40 did gyre and
gimble:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
otoh, perhaps a missing package is also a bugfix...
Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com schrieb am 09.06.2011
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Colin Guthrie
mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
I think updates would be the right place.
Please no 3rd repo :)
But i agree with you for updates for new packages ( no new
versions ;) )
I would prefer
On 9 June 2011 14:22, Oliver Burger oliver@googlemail.com wrote:
Dexter Morgan dmorga...@gmail.com schrieb am 09.06.2011
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie
wrote:
I think updates would be the right place.
Please no 3rd repo :)
But i agree with you
On 9 June 2011 14:17, Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee wrote:
09.06.2011 15:13, Dexter Morgan kirjutas:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Colin Guthriemag...@colin.guthr.ie
wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 10:40 did gyre and
gimble:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten
45 matches
Mail list logo
