On 07/07/11 06:07, Remco Rijnders wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 07:47:49PM -0400, David W. Hodgins wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:44:07 -0400, Michael scherer
wrote:
Since we took one month for various things ( such as discussing
everything ), we propose
the next release to be on 4th april, a
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 07:47:49PM -0400, David W. Hodgins wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:44:07 -0400, Michael scherer wrote:
Since we took one month for various things ( such as discussing everything ),
we propose
the next release to be on 4th april, and start the cycle today. This is in the
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:44:07 -0400, Michael scherer wrote:
Since we took one month for various things ( such as discussing everything ),
we propose
the next release to be on 4th april, and start the cycle today. This is in the
middle
of the week on purpose, to avoid the weekend.
Wasn't ther
2011/7/6 Michael scherer :
> Hi
>
> So after reading all the feedback on the topic of release, here
> are the conclusion of the discussion made by Anne and me :
>
Good and (AFAIK) comprehensive summary!
Now let's see what the "backport discussion" will produce.
--
wobo
Op woensdag 06 juli 2011 14:44:07 schreef Michael scherer:
> Hi
>
> So after reading all the feedback on the topic of release, here
> are the conclusion of the discussion made by Anne and me :
[...]
thanks for the good work!
Hi
So after reading all the feedback on the topic of release, here
are the conclusion of the discussion made by Anne and me :
- some people have expressed some concern about the fixed nature of the time
based release.
While it was obvious, we do not plan to release with serious bug, especially
