Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-12-09 Thread Giuseppe Ghibò
Michael scherer wrote: why this kind of "competition"? It is up to you to explain why you see competition when i just state that we have obviously a different set of ressources. Let's say the first feeling I had in reading... ;-) [...] We should summarize what there is from what th

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-12-05 Thread Michael scherer
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 11:38:55AM +0100, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote: > Michael Scherer wrote: > >So while nothing is done, while I am not a member of the QA team nor a > >leader, while I just speak to voice my opinion, and while this is just a > >proposal based on what other have done to solve the same

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-12-04 Thread Giuseppe Ghibò
Michael Scherer wrote: Well, from a physical point of view, everything is limited, so saying "limited ressources" didn't indeed told much. I think that the ressources at Mandriva could be summarized as "around 1 to 3 full time people ( maybe more, maybe less, and likely not full time on the s

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-12-02 Thread andre999
Maarten Vanraes a écrit : Op dinsdag 30 november 2010 13:31:08 schreef Samuel Verschelde: Hi, I would like to discuss the support policy for Mageia. It would be interesting to know (or decide) where Mageia is heading, given our limited resources : 1) focus on stability and security : few very

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-12-01 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op woensdag 01 december 2010 10:12:59 schreef Samuel Verschelde: > Le mercredi 1 décembre 2010 00:33:32, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > > Op dinsdag 30 november 2010 13:31:08 schreef Samuel Verschelde: > > > Samuel Verschelde > > > Packager/QA Team/User > > > > having read misc's lenghty and almost p

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-12-01 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Le mercredi 1 décembre 2010 00:33:32, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > > Op dinsdag 30 november 2010 13:31:08 schreef Samuel Verschelde: > > Samuel Verschelde > > Packager/QA Team/User > > having read misc's lenghty and almost political proposal, i suggest a 4th > option (even though i'm not part of

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-12-01 Thread Daniel Kreuter
2010/12/1 Buchan Milne > On Tuesday, 30 November 2010 18:09:38 Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 16:36 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > > > > > > > Well, I can't because as you already told me we don't know what our > > > resources will be. What I can guess is that they a

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-12-01 Thread Daniel Kreuter
2010/12/1 Maarten Vanraes > Op dinsdag 30 november 2010 13:31:08 schreef Samuel Verschelde: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to discuss the support policy for Mageia. > > > > It would be interesting to know (or decide) where Mageia is heading, > given > > our limited resources : 1) focus on stability

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-11-30 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op dinsdag 30 november 2010 13:31:08 schreef Samuel Verschelde: > Hi, > > I would like to discuss the support policy for Mageia. > > It would be interesting to know (or decide) where Mageia is heading, given > our limited resources : 1) focus on stability and security : few very well > equally su

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-11-30 Thread Michael Scherer
Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 16:36 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 16:13:25, Michael Scherer a écrit : > > > > Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 13:31 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to discuss the support policy for Mageia. > > > >

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-11-30 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 16:13:25, Michael Scherer a écrit : > > Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 13:31 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I would like to discuss the support policy for Mageia. > > > > It would be interesting to know (or decide) where Mageia is heading, given > >

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-11-30 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 16:13:25, Michael Scherer a écrit : > > Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 13:31 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I would like to discuss the support policy for Mageia. > > > > It would be interesting to know (or decide) where Mageia is heading, given > >

Re: [Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-11-30 Thread Michael Scherer
Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 13:31 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > Hi, > > I would like to discuss the support policy for Mageia. > > It would be interesting to know (or decide) where Mageia is heading, given > our limited resources : can you first explain what are our ressources so you ca

[Mageia-dev] Support policy

2010-11-30 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Hi, I would like to discuss the support policy for Mageia. It would be interesting to know (or decide) where Mageia is heading, given our limited resources : 1) focus on stability and security : few very well equally supported packages. Apparently, this is where we're going for now. May be w