On 04/14/2011 07:28 AM, Tux99 wrote:
Does anyone know what the status of the buildsystem with regards to
building dual core/tainted packages from a single source rpm is?
And to re-ask a related question that was never resolved: is tainted
supposed to be a replacement for PLF, or will PLF
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:02, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote:
On 04/14/2011 07:28 AM, Tux99 wrote:
Does anyone know what the status of the buildsystem with regards to
building dual core/tainted packages from a single source rpm is?
Not done yet. It's in sysadmin team's TODO (the
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 17:47 +0200, Romain d'Alverny a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 16:02, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote:
On 04/14/2011 07:28 AM, Tux99 wrote:
Does anyone know what the status of the buildsystem with regards to
building dual core/tainted packages from a
Hi,
since the package version freeze is coming nearer (April, 20th), perhaps we
should discuss the tainted issue once more.
What is our policy about tainted packages? It's quite clear we have to check
every one of them, if they can be distributed by us, but do we have any
guidlines?
What
