On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> Someone got the BS down
> --
> Best regards
> Thomas Spuhler
shouldbe OK now
Someone got the BS down
--
Best regards
Thomas Spuhler
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 07:23, Funda Wang wrote:
> It seems that packages marked as uploaded won't appear in distrib-coffee,
> for at least two hours. Is it the problem with newly introduced youri
> peroid, or just distrib-coffee was lazy now?
This "youri" is just some more information on the web
It seems that packages marked as uploaded won't appear in distrib-coffee,
for at least two hours. Is it the problem with newly introduced youri
peroid, or just distrib-coffee was lazy now?
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 09:57, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as signaled by jq and mikala, the BS is down for the moment, a issue
> with chroot. It sems perl(URPM) is no longer provided ( and urpmi
> provide perl(urpm) instead ), and therefore, we cannot install
> basesystem.
>
> Sysadmins are l
Hi,
as signaled by jq and mikala, the BS is down for the moment, a issue
with chroot. It sems perl(URPM) is no longer provided ( and urpmi
provide perl(urpm) instead ), and therefore, we cannot install
basesystem.
Sysadmins are looking at the problem, we will keep you updated.
--
Michael Schere
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:21, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Pascal Terjan skrev 31.1.2011 00:54:
>>
>> All packages have been rebuild, BS should be back in its original state
>>
>
> Have you also re-enabled youri reuploading check ?
Yes that's what I mean by "BS should be back in its original state"
Pascal Terjan skrev 31.1.2011 00:54:
All packages have been rebuild, BS should be back in its original state
Have you also re-enabled youri reuploading check ?
--
Thomas
2011/1/30 Michael Scherer :
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:58:07 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:00:31 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi following a manipulation error, part of the bootstrap mirror
>>> have been erased. We have restored part of it from the backup made on
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:58:07 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:00:31 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
Hi following a manipulation error, part of the bootstrap mirror
have been erased. We have restored part of it from the backup made
on d-c,
but we are not sure that everything w
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:00:31 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
Hi following a manipulation error, part of the bootstrap mirror
have been erased. We have restored part of it from the backup made on
d-c,
but we are not sure that everything was restored, Olivier is
currently checking.
We are working
Hi following a manipulation error, part of the bootstrap mirror
have been erased. We have restored part of it from the backup made on
d-c,
but we are not sure that everything was restored, Olivier is currently
checking.
We are working on fixing it ASAP.
In any case, the svn was not impacted a
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:40:41PM +0100, Olivier Blin wrote:
> And we should put it under version control, as well as media.cfg.
> Maybe like we were doing with meta-task, with auto-extraction on some
> package upload.
>
> How about a new mageia-media-info package with media.cfg + file-deps ?
>
On 14 January 2011 17:40, Olivier Blin wrote:
>> ah I see, you're saying this because of the merging in core/release.
>> But we might still have file deps in packages of other repos...
>
> Yes, that's right...
> Though, Mandriva's file-deps is 95 lines long, maybe it can be cleaned a
> bit.
>
> An
On 14.01.2011 18:44, Olivier Blin wrote:
> Michael Scherer writes:
>
>> Le vendredi 14 janvier 2011 à 11:39 +0100, Olivier Blin a écrit :
>>> Thomas Spuhler writes:
>>>
Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
>
> [...]
>
>>> Actually, I already fixed this error in iurt SVN yesterd
Michael Scherer writes:
> Le vendredi 14 janvier 2011 à 11:39 +0100, Olivier Blin a écrit :
>> Thomas Spuhler writes:
>>
>> > Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
[...]
>> Actually, I already fixed this error in iurt SVN yesterday, but I've now
>> uploaded a package with the fix on
Thierry Vignaud writes:
> On 14 January 2011 16:05, Olivier Blin wrote:
> Actually, I already fixed this error in iurt SVN yesterday, but I've now
> uploaded a package with the fix on the BS nodes.
Another common error these days is that file dependencies are not added
aut
On 14 January 2011 16:05, Olivier Blin wrote:
Actually, I already fixed this error in iurt SVN yesterday, but I've now
uploaded a package with the fix on the BS nodes.
>>>
>>> Another common error these days is that file dependencies are not added
>>> automatically in hdlist.
>>> Accordi
Thierry Vignaud writes:
> On 14 January 2011 14:53, Olivier Blin wrote:
>>> Actually, I already fixed this error in iurt SVN yesterday, but I've now
>>> uploaded a package with the fix on the BS nodes.
>>
>> Another common error these days is that file dependencies are not added
>> automatically
On 14.01.2011 17:00, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> * Anssi Hannula (anssi.hann...@iki.fi) wrote:
>> On 14.01.2011 15:53, Olivier Blin wrote:
>>> Another common error these days is that file dependencies are not added
>>> automatically in hdlist.
>>> According to genhdlist doc, this should be done automa
On 14 January 2011 14:53, Olivier Blin wrote:
>> Actually, I already fixed this error in iurt SVN yesterday, but I've now
>> uploaded a package with the fix on the BS nodes.
>
> Another common error these days is that file dependencies are not added
> automatically in hdlist.
> According to genhdl
* Anssi Hannula (anssi.hann...@iki.fi) wrote:
> On 14.01.2011 15:53, Olivier Blin wrote:
> > Another common error these days is that file dependencies are not added
> > automatically in hdlist.
> > According to genhdlist doc, this should be done automatically for
> > packages from the same media.
>
On 14.01.2011 15:53, Olivier Blin wrote:
> Olivier Blin writes:
>
>> Thomas Spuhler writes:
>>
>>> Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
>>
>> Yes, it was.
>
> [...]
>
>> Actually, I already fixed this error in iurt SVN yesterday, but I've now
>> uploaded a package with the fix on th
Olivier Blin writes:
> Thomas Spuhler writes:
>
>> Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
>
> Yes, it was.
[...]
> Actually, I already fixed this error in iurt SVN yesterday, but I've now
> uploaded a package with the fix on the BS nodes.
Another common error these days is that file
* Olivier Blin (mag...@blino.org) wrote:
> Thomas Spuhler writes:
>
> > Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
>
> Actually, I already fixed this error in iurt SVN yesterday, but I've now
> uploaded a package with the fix on the BS nodes.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience, it should not
Le vendredi 14 janvier 2011 à 11:39 +0100, Olivier Blin a écrit :
> Thomas Spuhler writes:
>
> > Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
>
> Yes, it was.
> Actually, I've uploaded one after the other two packages that are in the
> chroot tarball: mingetty, then make.
>
> In the next pac
Thomas Spuhler writes:
> Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
Yes, it was.
Actually, I've uploaded one after the other two packages that are in the
chroot tarball: mingetty, then make.
In the next package build (libcroco0.6), iurt decided to rebuild the
chroot tarball for mingetty.
B
Le vendredi 14 janvier 2011 à 05:25 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> Le jeudi 13 janvier 2011 à 21:04 -0700, Thomas Spuhler a écrit :
> > Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
>
> Well, it is working on command line on the build node, so I guess that
> the problem is more subtle.
>
>
Le jeudi 13 janvier 2011 à 21:04 -0700, Thomas Spuhler a écrit :
> Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
Well, it is working on command line on the build node, so I guess that
the problem is more subtle.
By the way, I have found a error :
[iurt cauldron] iurtjonund~$ sudo urpmi rpm-bui
Is the bs down. Looks like rpmbuild is missing?
--
Thomas
30 matches
Mail list logo
