Re: [Mageia-dev] new urpmi release ?

2012-03-19 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Le 19/03/2012 12:50, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : You didn't describe your changes in NEWS :-) Done. -- BOFH excuse #108: The air conditioning water supply pipe ruptured over the machine room

Re: [Mageia-dev] new urpmi release ?

2012-03-19 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 16 March 2012 19:18, Guillaume Rousse wrote: I have fixed two bugs in urpmi bash completion: - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373 - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4937 However, I'm unaware of any other changes in the perl code itself. Is it sage t

Re: [Mageia-dev] new urpmi release ?

2012-03-16 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Le 16/03/2012 18:09, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : On 16 March 2012 08:25, Thierry Vignaud wrote: I have fixed two bugs in urpmi bash completion: - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373 - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4937 However, I'm unaware of any other changes in the perl code

Re: [Mageia-dev] new urpmi release ?

2012-03-16 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 16 March 2012 08:25, Thierry Vignaud wrote: >> I have fixed two bugs in urpmi bash completion: >> - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373 >> - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4937 >> >> However, I'm unaware of any other changes in the perl code itself. Is it >> sage to proceed wit

Re: [Mageia-dev] new urpmi release ?

2012-03-16 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 15 March 2012 22:02, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > I have fixed two bugs in urpmi bash completion: > - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373 > - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4937 > > However, I'm unaware of any other changes in the perl code itself. Is it > sage to proceed with a n

[Mageia-dev] new urpmi release ?

2012-03-15 Thread Guillaume Rousse
I have fixed two bugs in urpmi bash completion: - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373 - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4937 However, I'm unaware of any other changes in the perl code itself. Is it sage to proceed with a new release ? -- BOFH excuse #229: wrong polarity of neut