On Sun, 8 May 2011, Bruno Cornec wrote:
Pascal Terjan said on Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:48:44PM +0100:
mondo 0:2.2.9.5-1.mga1 <= 0:2.29.3-1mdv2010.1
I'm still looking for a solution that would allow us to follow the right
numbering for the life of Mageia, without forcing the usage of Epoch.
Pascal Terjan said on Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:48:44PM +0100:
> mondo 0:2.2.9.5-1.mga1 <= 0:2.29.3-1mdv2010.1
I'm still looking for a solution that would allow us to follow the right
numbering for the life of Mageia, without forcing the usage of Epoch.
The only solution I see, would be to move ups
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 00:06, Michael scherer wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 12:28:58AM +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>> Updated list (includes backports)
> do not forget that version freeze is in effect.
> So unless there is a reason to upgrade ( and upgrade from
> backports is like upgrade from
Thomas Backlund said on Sun, May 01, 2011 at 03:07:58PM +0300:
> > Most of the time it's just for avoiding an incompatibility which will
> > force the distribution to keep it for the rest of its life. So adopting
>
> Thats the price you have to pay when you want to alter versioning
> downwards or
On 1 May 2011 14:40, Anssi Hannula wrote:
> On 30.04.2011 23:05, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
>> Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
>>> Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
>>>
>> [...]
>>> netbook-kde4-config 0:1-0.28.mga1 <= 0:2010.1-22mdv2010.1
>> [..
In data sabato 30 aprile 2011 21:42:54, Pascal Terjan ha scritto:
> tuxpaint 1:0.9.21-1.mga1 <= 1:0.9.21-2mdv2010.2
> tuxpaint-config 0:0.0.12-1.mga1 <= 0:0.0.12-2mdv2010.1
> tuxpaint-config 0:0.0.12-1.mga1 <= 0:0.0.12-4mdv2010.2
That were my fault, i left cooker version in contrib/upgrade for
som
On 30.04.2011 23:53, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 22:21, Maarten Vanraes
> wrote:
>> Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
>>> Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
>>>
>>> afio 0:2.5-1.mga1 <= 0:2.5-6mdv2010.0
>>> automake1.7 0:1.7.9
On 30.04.2011 23:05, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
> Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
>> Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
>>
> [...]
>> netbook-kde4-config 0:1-0.28.mga1 <= 0:2010.1-22mdv2010.1
> [...]
>
> this sounds like a difficult one... how are
sön 2011-05-01 klockan 12:39 +0300 skrev Bruno Cornec:
> Thomas Backlund said on Sun, May 01, 2011 at 01:56:21AM +0300:
>
> > Or simply fixed by adding an epoch
>
> Oh, please no !!!
> Epoch is somewhere the negation of versions. And then you have to
> embedded it all the time in all packages.
>
Michael scherer said on Sun, May 01, 2011 at 12:59:41AM +0200:
> While we are on it, what about afio ?
> The license is unclear for fedora :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037
I remember that very well. This is a good reason BTW why mondo is still
not part of Fedora.
That's al
Thomas Backlund said on Sun, May 01, 2011 at 01:56:21AM +0300:
> Or simply fixed by adding an epoch
Oh, please no !!!
Epoch is somewhere the negation of versions. And then you have to
embedded it all the time in all packages.
I think we should have a rule to avoid as much a possible an epoch.
M
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 12:28:58AM +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> Updated list (includes backports)
do not forget that version freeze is in effect.
So unless there is a reason to upgrade ( and upgrade from
backports is like upgrade from cooker, nice to have but not required )
> libmikmod-devel 0:3.
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 12:27:24AM +0200, Bruno Cornec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> magnus said on Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:55:04PM +0200:
> > .Mondo: The version number in Mandriva is a little bit confusing.
> > 2.29.3 belongs to 2.2.9.3 in the origin mondo repository.
> > There is version 2.2.9.6 actuall
sön 2011-05-01 klockan 01:51 +0300 skrev magnus:
>
>
> 2011/5/1 Bruno Cornec
> Well, I thought that having a new distro was also the
> opportunity to
> remove the mistakes made in the past.
>
> So as the upstream of mondo, I'd really like to see packages
2011/5/1 Bruno Cornec
> Well, I thought that having a new distro was also the opportunity to
> remove the mistakes made in the past.
>
> So as the upstream of mondo, I'd really like to see packages in Mageia
> using the upstream versions, and not stick to the legacy of Mandriva
> here.
>
> Of cou
Hello,
magnus said on Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:55:04PM +0200:
> .Mondo: The version number in Mandriva is a little bit confusing.
> 2.29.3 belongs to 2.2.9.3 in the origin mondo repository.
> There is version 2.2.9.6 actually (2011-04-13).
> So the Mageia version 2.2.9.5 is near by
Well, I though
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 00:28, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
> Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 22:53:49 schreef Pascal Terjan:
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 22:21, Maarten Vanraes
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
>> >> Here is a list of packages to fix (not including bac
Updated list (includes backports)
avalon-framework 0:4.1.4-10.mga1 <= 0:4.2.0-1.4.2mdv2010.1
avalon-framework-javadoc 0:4.1.4-10.mga1 <= 0:4.2.0-1.4.2mdv2010.1
avalon-framework-manual 0:4.1.4-10.mga1 <= 0:4.2.0-1.4.2mdv2010.1
blender 0:2.49b-7.mga1 <= 0:2.57-2mdv2010.2 # This one should be
reverte
Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 22:53:49 schreef Pascal Terjan:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 22:21, Maarten Vanraes
>
> wrote:
> > Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
> >> Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
> >>
> >> afio 0:2.5-1.mga1 <= 0:2.5-6mdv2010.0
.Mondo: The version number in Mandriva is a little bit confusing.
2.29.3 belongs to 2.2.9.3 in the origin mondo repository.
There is version 2.2.9.6 actually (2011-04-13).
So the Mageia version 2.2.9.5 is near by
Magnus
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:30:44PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> lör 2011-04-30 klockan 23:21 +0300 skrev Maarten Vanraes:
> > Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
> > > Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
> > >
> > > afio 0:2.5-1.mga1 <= 0:2.5-6m
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 22:21, Maarten Vanraes
wrote:
> Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
>> Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
>>
>> afio 0:2.5-1.mga1 <= 0:2.5-6mdv2010.0
>> automake1.7 0:1.7.9-10.mga1 <= 0:1.7.9-10.1mdv2010.1
> [...]
>
> isn't
lör 2011-04-30 klockan 23:21 +0300 skrev Maarten Vanraes:
> Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
> > Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
> >
> > afio 0:2.5-1.mga1 <= 0:2.5-6mdv2010.0
> > automake1.7 0:1.7.9-10.mga1 <= 0:1.7.9-10.1mdv2010.1
> [...]
>
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
> Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
> > Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
> >
> > afio 0:2.5-1.mga1 <= 0:2.5-6mdv2010.0
> > automake1.7 0:1.7.9-10.mga1 <= 0:1.7.9-10.1mdv2010.1
> [...]
>
> isn't thi
Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
> Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
>
> afio 0:2.5-1.mga1 <= 0:2.5-6mdv2010.0
> automake1.7 0:1.7.9-10.mga1 <= 0:1.7.9-10.1mdv2010.1
[...]
isn't this one actually higher? afaik the matchings come from ascii, a
lör 2011-04-30 klockan 23:05 +0300 skrev Maarten Vanraes:
> Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
> > Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
> >
> [...]
> > netbook-kde4-config 0:1-0.28.mga1 <= 0:2010.1-22mdv2010.1
> [...]
>
> this sounds like a diffic
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 22:05, Maarten Vanraes
wrote:
> Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
>> Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
>>
> [...]
>> netbook-kde4-config 0:1-0.28.mga1 <= 0:2010.1-22mdv2010.1
> [...]
>
> this sounds like a difficult one.
Op zaterdag 30 april 2011 21:42:54 schreef Pascal Terjan:
> Here is a list of packages to fix (not including backports yet)
>
[...]
> netbook-kde4-config 0:1-0.28.mga1 <= 0:2010.1-22mdv2010.1
[...]
this sounds like a difficult one... how are you doing to do this?
28 matches
Mail list logo
