York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks Kyle for the tip. However, because in my customization I've called or
bound a lot of Magit functions / commands, it would be nice if there's a way
to
quickly figure out the new names of those functions / commands I've used.
Without a
You could byte-compile your customization : it'll warn you about most
potential problems (change in the number of arguments and non-existing names).
I'm sorry if my post was not clear enough. But I've NEVER had problem knowing
which functions have changed their name. The problem I had was that
Don't take it too serious man, it's not a big deal and I was NOT offended! I'm
sorry if I appeared to have been offended. Also, I don't think your message was
useless because I believe every message posted here is useful. Maybe somebody
will find it inspiring some day who knows.
Have a nice day!
York Zhao gtdplatf...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that numerous functions have changed their name making it
really hard to figure out the new names, do you know if there is
somewhere documenting all the function name changes?
I don't think there is, but a good way to approach it is to look in
Thanks Kyle for the tip. However, because in my customization I've called or
bound a lot of Magit functions / commands, it would be nice if there's a way to
quickly figure out the new names of those functions / commands I've used.
Without a documentation for changed function / command names, I
I'm switching to Magit 2.1, but I can't find `magit-interactive-rebase' any
more. Since I'm an extremely heavy user of this function, I really hope it
hasn't been and will not be dropped.
Thanks,
York
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
magit group
Hi all,
the docs say:
,[ C-h f magit-interactive-rebase RET ]
| magit-interactive-rebase is an interactive autoloaded compiled Lisp function
in
| `magit.el'.
|
| (magit-interactive-rebase COMMIT)
|
| Start a git rebase -i session, old school-style.
`
The old school-style suggests
the better way (at least in past versions of Magit) is to
magit-invoke-rewrite-start.
For example in the Log buffer r s invokes that.
On 17 January 2014 11:43, Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi all,
the docs say:
,[ C-h f magit-interactive-rebase RET ]
| magit-interactive-rebase
Michal Maruska mmaru...@gmail.com
writes:
Hi Michal,
the better way (at least in past versions of Magit) is to
magit-invoke-rewrite-start.
That's not even defined in my MELPA version of Magit.
For example in the Log buffer r s invokes that.
That would do `magit-rewrite-stop' here. r b
Well,
1/ I indeed use old version of Magit (after trying to upgrade in
~September, I decided to return back)
2/ I indeed added myself this command/function, to use the current
line as the base for rewriting
Commit msg.: from LOG start-rewriting history w/ no questions (unless C-u)
Michal Maruska mmaru...@gmail.com
writes:
2/ I indeed added myself this command/function, to use the current
line as the base for rewriting
Commit msg.: from LOG start-rewriting history w/ no questions (unless C-u)
(define-key magit-log-mode-map (kbd r s) 'magit-invoke-rewrite-start)
I didn't know about this git rebase --interactive getting as usable
as magit rewriting.
See https://github.com/magit/magit/issues/877 for a comparison of rebase,
cherry-pick and magit's rewrite.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
magit group.
To
On Friday, January 17, 2014 4:37:42 PM UTC+1, Jonas Bernoulli wrote:
I didn't know about this git rebase --interactive getting as usable
as magit rewriting.
See https://github.com/magit/magit/issues/877 for a comparison of rebase,
cherry-pick and magit's rewrite.
Actually I meant
The old school-style suggests to me that there's a newer, better way
to start an interactive rebase. Is there? If so, how?
The doc-string is misleading (and will be fixed). This is the recommended way
of doing this sort of thing.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Jonas Bernoulli jo...@bernoul.li writes:
I didn't know about this git rebase --interactive getting as
usable as magit rewriting.
See https://github.com/magit/magit/issues/877 for a comparison of
rebase, cherry-pick and magit's rewrite.
Actually I meant
Jonas Bernoulli jo...@bernoul.li writes:
The old school-style suggests to me that there's a newer, better
way to start an interactive rebase. Is there? If so, how?
The doc-string is misleading (and will be fixed). This is the
recommended way of doing this sort of thing.
Thanks for the
16 matches
Mail list logo
