Re: magit-interactive-rebase

2015-07-15 Thread Kyle Meyer
York Zhao wrote: > I'm switching to Magit 2.1, but I can't find `magit-interactive-rebase' any > more. Since I'm an extremely heavy user of this function, I really hope it > hasn't been and will not be dropped. It's now magit-rebase-interactive, which is in the rebase popup. -- Kyle -- You rec

Re: Revert a file in magit-status-mode

2015-07-15 Thread Kyle Meyer
Hello, York Zhao wrote: > Hi, > > Before Magit 2.1, I can revert a file by selecting the file in > magit-status-mode > and hit `v'. However, in Magit 2.1, `v' has been bound to `magit-reverse' > which > always gives me the error: "user-error: Cannot reverse unstaged changes". How > do > I reve

Re: magit-interactive-rebase

2015-07-15 Thread Kyle Meyer
York Zhao wrote: > I noticed that numerous functions have changed their name making it > really hard to figure out the new names, do you know if there is > somewhere documenting all the function name changes? I don't think there is, but a good way to approach it is to look in the relevant popup (

Re: magit-rev and magit-diff-visit-file: edit the file in HEAD

2015-07-17 Thread Kyle Meyer
Daniel Dehennin wrote: [...] > My problem is that I can not find a quick way to open the files from > magit-rev buffer or after viewing a file with magit-diff-visit-file. > > Is there a way to make “C-u magit-diff-visit-file” open the file at > current HEAD? Just to be clear: from the buffer visi

Re: magit-diff and tab expansion

2015-07-17 Thread Kyle Meyer
Yuri D'Elia wrote: > I like to manually expand tabs in magit-diff (on whenever I'm looking > at diff output). [...] > I don't think there would be any side-effect, since there's no point > in editing the diff itself, except when you're searching in the diff > for literal tabs. magit-apply and mag

Re: magit-diff and tab expansion

2015-07-18 Thread Kyle Meyer
Yuri D'Elia wrote: > On 18/07/15 11:38, Yuri D'Elia wrote: [...] >> Humm, maybe I could use an overlay to fix just the display then. [...] > Do you still think that this could break magit-apply? No, I think the patch will be applied correctly in that case. -- Kyle -- You received this message

Re: magit-rev and magit-diff-visit-file: edit the file in HEAD

2015-09-25 Thread Kyle Meyer
Robin Green writes: > On Friday, 17 July 2015 20:33:09 UTC+1, Kyle Meyer wrote: >> Daniel Dehennin wrote: >> [...] >> > My problem is that I can not find a quick way to open the files from >> > magit-rev buffer or after viewing a file with magit-diff-visit-

Re: How to diff two branches with ediff preview

2015-11-09 Thread Kyle Meyer
Markus Lachinger writes: [...] > So my ideal workflow would be: > > magit-diff the branches > > -- > | foo.rb| > | bar.txt | > | .| > -- > When I now go onto foo.rb and trigger the functio

Re: How to diff two branches with ediff preview

2015-11-09 Thread Kyle Meyer
Markus Lachinger writes: [...] > The motivation / use case is to be able to quickly assess the changes > that were made i.e. between two branches while having more context > than just the diff ± a few lines, or just be able to jump around in > the file. > > I could use RET to jump to the file an

Re: Slow magit status buffer

2015-11-18 Thread Kyle Meyer
Hi Ning, Ning Shi writes: > I've noticed that the performance of magit has been noticeably worse > than before after I upgraded from v1.x to v2.x. I googled around and > didn't find a solution that solved the problem. > > I ran the profiler and collected some results on a simple status > buffer

Re: Discard Unpulled commits to upstream

2015-12-30 Thread Kyle Meyer
Julien Cubizolles writes: > I'm not sure I'm using the origin/upstream concepts how they should be > used. I've forked a github repository to add some custom changes, set > origin (at first push) to the fork in my personal github repo and set > upstream (through b u) to the repo I forked (zenoroc

Re: Discard Unpulled commits to upstream

2015-12-30 Thread Kyle Meyer
Julien Cubizolles writes: > Kyle Meyer writes: >> If you don't find the information useful, you can remove >> magit-insert-unpushed-to-upstream from magit-status-sections-hook. > > That will come handy. Considering the frequency of my micro-commits, this > list o

Re: magit-clone error message

2016-02-11 Thread Kyle Meyer
Hello, Seb writes: > Hello, > > Using the current magit packages from Melpa, doing magit-clone on a > github project I get a "Not inside a Git repository" error message on > *Messages* on the minibuffer after answering "yes" to the question "Set > `remote.pushDefault' to origin?". However, c

Re: Summary Window?

2016-06-02 Thread Kyle Meyer
Tim Visher writes: > A very useful feature of using git from the command line is that when you > pull from remotes you get a nice summary of everything that's changed since > you last pulled. > > In Magit I just get a confirmation that it was successful. > > I know that I can open up the process

Re: Magit quit error

2016-07-26 Thread Kyle Meyer
writes: > When trying to quit Magit with typing q, I get: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments (1 . 1) 0) > magit-mode-quit-window() > magit-quit-session() > funcall-interactively(magit-quit-session) > call-interactively(magit-quit-session nil nil) > command-exec

Re: Problem with stash entry with untracked file

2016-09-08 Thread Kyle Meyer
Nathaniel Mishkin writes: > First (and as you've probably surmised), I'm doing all this in a repo with > a lot of files in it. > > Scenario: > > * I modify one tracked file and add one untracked file. "git status" shows > the expected output (info about both the change and the untracked file). I

Re: show tracked file changes from a higher-level directory

2016-11-04 Thread Kyle Meyer
Erik van Zwol writes: > I'm new to magit. I'm in the status buffer, and I only see changes > made to files in the directory of the file from which I got to the > status buffer. I am two directory levels down into my project, how do > I see changes to a file such as .gitignore, which is in the g

Re: External mergetool support

2016-11-19 Thread Kyle Meyer
[I accidentally dropped the list in the reply. Resending.] Martin Geisler writes: [...] > The only times were I have to drop back to a terminal and raw Git > commands is when I have merge conflicts. I then run "git mergetool" in > my terminal to have KDiff3 start on the files in question. > >

Re: External mergetool support

2016-11-19 Thread Kyle Meyer
Noam Postavsky writes: [...] > There's no special support in Magit for external tools (Real Emacsers > use ediff ;) ). No, smerge is all you need :) -- Kyle -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "magit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop re

Re: Sorting branch names by most recently used

2016-11-23 Thread Kyle Meyer
Hello, Martin Geisler writes: > Hi all, > > Does Magit have an option to sort branch names by the order they have > been used? No, not that I'm aware of. > > I'm using magit-ido-completing-read and as far as I can tell, the > order of the branches is alphabetically. That is normally not such a

Re: Create spinoff branch containing one commit

2017-01-05 Thread Kyle Meyer
Allen Li writes: > Is there a way to create a spinoff branch containing one commit? Hmm, I don't think there is. > I'm aware that you can use the region to select a number of commits > for the spinoff branch, but I haven't found a way to select just one > commit (HEAD). I often make a single c

Re: Create spinoff branch containing one commit

2017-01-06 Thread Kyle Meyer
Allen Li writes: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Kyle Meyer wrote: >> I'll open an issue or PR within the next couple days to discuss this. > > Thanks! Looks like Jonas opened an issue for this earlier today. https://github.com/magit/magit/issues/2920 -- Kyle -

Re: Specify a different author at commit time

2017-01-26 Thread Kyle Meyer
Lele Gaifax writes: > Hi, > > I seem to remember a way to specify a different Author for a specific commit, > but I wasn't able to find it in current version of magit/git-commit, just the > pseudo-headers ala "Suggested-by". > > Am I missing something or was the feature dropped? You can override

Re: prompt for local branches?

2017-03-12 Thread Kyle Meyer
Sam Cramer writes: > Is there a way to have magit prompt for local branches only when > asking for a branch? No, not if a command calls magit-list-branches rather than magit-list-local-branches to generate the collection. > Alternately, is there a way to have the completions sorted so that > lo

Re: prompt for local branches?

2017-04-02 Thread Kyle Meyer
Kyle Meyer writes: > Sam Cramer writes: [...] >> Alternately, is there a way to have the completions sorted so that >> local branches appear first? > > Not at the moment. There's an issue about sorting branches by commit > date [*1*] and an issue about positio

Re: documentation on writing extensions?

2017-05-07 Thread Kyle Meyer
John Kitchin writes: > Has the documentation for writing extensions to magit been moved? All > I could find is labeled: Magit User Manual (1.2 OBSOLETE): Activating > extensions. I'm not sure what documentation may have existed in the past, but I'm not aware of any documentation for recent versi

Re: documentation on writing extensions?

2017-05-08 Thread Kyle Meyer
John Kitchin writes: > I have figured out most of it by looking at other extensions, but there > have been a few points that still aren't clear, mostly related to > keymaps, menu items, etc.. that I thought there might be some > documentation somewhere on. Some information on sections and their

Re: Does magit when using ediff have a means for moving on the next file when there are multiple files to be diffed?

2017-09-08 Thread Kyle Meyer
vfclists writes: > I am using `ediff` to get side by side diffs with `magit` and there > seems to be no way to move to the next pair of files, after diffing > the current file. [...] > Does the ediff have a method of doing that? No, not that I'm aware of. -- Kyle -- You received this messa

Re: Jump to issue tracker from revision buffer

2017-09-14 Thread Kyle Meyer
Martin Geisler writes: > > I notice that Magit highlights parts in brackets when showing commit > messages. I typically use that for issue numbers, such as [FOO-123]. Would > it be possible to have that be a link to the actual issue tracker? > Something so that I can press RET when point is in the

Re: Interactive rebase "edit" to split commits

2017-11-30 Thread Kyle Meyer
Paul Smith writes: > Fairly often I find myself wanting to split commits when I do > interactive rebasing and I'm wondering if anyone has hints for how to > handle this more easily using Magit. > > What I do today is invoke interactive rebase from Magit and mark the > commit I want to split with

Re: interactive rebase (-i) much slower to start in newest version

2018-06-12 Thread Kyle Meyer
Hello, noam.le...@elastifile.com writes: > Hi, I just updated my magit to latest using emacs packaging(Not sure which > version was running before). > > There's now a big delay after I hit '-i' for interactive rebase. Is this a > known issue? I'm not aware of any other reports about this. --

Re: Searching for Authors in magit-log

2018-07-10 Thread Kyle Meyer
Silfheed writes: > Hello > > I'm trying to search the logs in the magit-log buffer for all > occurrences of a particular author. Once I enter into the logs for a > repo from the status buffer (using ll) how do I search through the log > buffer by author? Just using regular isearch doesn't seem to

Re: Customizing commands ran by magit

2019-02-21 Thread Kyle Meyer
Hi John, John Shahid writes: > Hi all, > > Is there a way to customize the command that magit run when I commit, > e.g. using `git ci' (a user defined alias) instead of `git commit' ? I > used to have a popup action to run `git ci' bound to "i". With the > recent switch to transient my customi

Re: Visit the whole commit from file-focused magit-revision

2019-05-25 Thread Kyle Meyer
Lele Gaifax writes: > Hi all, > > when I visit the commit history of a file with magit-log-buffer-file, and then > enter into a particular commit, I end in a magit-revision buffer showing just > the details of that particular file, with a title like "Commit FOO limited to > file BAR". > > I tried

Re: Question about the two branches

2021-07-02 Thread Kyle Meyer
jmcki...@gmail.com writes: > I read the manual about the two branches, Do you mean two remotes? > and while it makes perfect sense, it is really useful for my feature > branch to point to the remote version of itself as the upstream > branch. This lets me see if anyone else has pushed commits th