** Changed in: mahara
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara
Contributors, which is subscribed to Mahara.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702264
Title:
Item order in Site Settings - Security Settings - Anti-spam
** Changed in: mahara
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara
Contributors, which is subscribed to Mahara.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702264
Title:
Item order in Site Settings - Security Settings - Anti-spam
** Changed in: mahara
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara
Contributors, which is subscribed to Mahara.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702264
Title:
Item order in Site Settings - Security Settings - Anti-spam
Status
** Changed in: mahara
Assignee: Dominik Schmid (dominikschmid93) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: mahara
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara
Contributors, which is subscribed to Mahara.
There is no obvious reason to define the weight at the moment, I just
suggest using it for ordering. Defining it inside each fine might make
things slightly complicated. Say, if we will have 8 different traps,
adding one more will require checking the existing ones to find out
which weight to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would suggest removing the numbering scheme and go for a config file
that has an array of the files to use in the order to use them.
On 28/01/11 23:14, Ruslan Kabalin wrote:
Would be great if someone else from dev-team could advice on it, using
If the intention is to allow site admins to 'drop in' more antispam
files and be able to order them as they like, then the default weights
should leave gaps: maybe number them as 10, 20, 30 rather than 00, 01,
02. I don't think it's very likely that anyone would make use of this
though, so it
Would be great if someone else from dev-team could advice on it, using
numbers in the file name for weightening the spam methods seems OK to me
(it could be replaced with keeping the weight as constants in the files,
but it will be difficult to maintain). If it is all right I will
implement the
Use this patch instead of my previous one.
** Patch added: Updated filenames on request and edited the loading of them
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mahara/+bug/702264/+attachment/1799860/+files/0001-lp-702264-Antispam-patch.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Patch added: Renamed Spamfilters to be in logical order and adjusted the
code to use this.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mahara/+bug/702264/+attachment/1798716/+files/0001-antispam-lp-702264.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara
Contributors, which
** Changed in: mahara
Status: Triaged = Confirmed
** Changed in: mahara
Assignee: (unassigned) = qwert33 (dominikschmid93)
** Changed in: mahara
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara
Contributors, which is
** Changed in: mahara
Milestone: None = 1.4.0
** Changed in: mahara
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: mahara
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara
Contributors, which is subscribed to Mahara.
12 matches
Mail list logo
