Re: Logging format

2010-02-13 Thread Drew Farris
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Robin Anil wrote: > each log entry is 2 lines for starters, Just point me to the xml where the > configuration is there. If there isnt any I will have to explore a bit more On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > There isn't one, that is the def

Re: Logging format

2010-02-13 Thread Grant Ingersoll
There isn't one, that is the default JUL configuration. On Feb 13, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Robin Anil wrote: > each log entry is 2 lines for starters, Just point me to the xml where the > configuration is there. If there isnt any I will have to explore a bit more > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:59

Re: Logging format

2010-02-13 Thread Robin Anil
each log entry is 2 lines for starters, Just point me to the xml where the configuration is there. If there isnt any I will have to explore a bit more On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Drew Farris wrote: > Which output are you trying to get rid of? Have you tried 'mvn -q'? > This might be too q

Re: Logging format

2010-02-13 Thread Drew Farris
Which output are you trying to get rid of? Have you tried 'mvn -q'? This might be too quiet for your purposes, but it is quick and easy. It won't quell any log output from tests that use a logging framework however. IIRC all unit test ouput should go to files, but maven will still you which tests a

Re: Logging format

2010-02-13 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Probably easiest to point you at http://www.slf4j.org/. I usually switch to Log4J and then configure it that way. On Feb 13, 2010, at 4:57 AM, Robin Anil wrote: > Where can i change the log file format for mvn. The current one is too > verbose when doing mvn execution

Logging format

2010-02-13 Thread Robin Anil
Where can i change the log file format for mvn. The current one is too verbose when doing mvn execution