Whew! doing a clean build resolved the phantom test class. All tests
pass, even mine :)
Jeff Eastman wrote:
The build compiles but org.apache.mahout.math.TestVectorWritable fails
for some reason and it does not get to my test.
Jeff Eastman wrote:
I will run the build before I commit.
I wil
TestVectorWritable fails? What is it saying in the surefire report?
-jake
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> The build compiles but org.apache.mahout.math.TestVectorWritable fails for
> some reason and it does not get to my test.
>
>
>
> Jeff Eastman wrote:
>
>> I will ru
The build compiles but org.apache.mahout.math.TestVectorWritable fails
for some reason and it does not get to my test.
Jeff Eastman wrote:
I will run the build before I commit.
I will run the build before I commit.
...
I will run the build before I commit.
my bad
Ted Dunning wrote:
Our mod
I will run the build before I commit.
I will run the build before I commit.
...
I will run the build before I commit.
my bad
Ted Dunning wrote:
Our modules aren't working out as well as expected.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
Sean Owen wrote:
That last commi
I can easily move it into the /utils/test subtree. Tried that and it now
builds ok. I actually like it fine there with the Lucene/text stuff.
Sean Owen wrote:
Actually, I suppose it's not a big deal if core *tests* depend on
utils. I can make that adjustment if that sounds right.
On Wed, Jan
I don't think there's any practical or conceptual problem with core
*tests* depending on utils.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> You may have hit a classic maven annoyance which is shared test code.
> Generally, people seem to end up with more modules than they expected
You may have hit a classic maven annoyance which is shared test code.
Generally, people seem to end up with more modules than they expected
to.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Our modules aren't working out as well as expected.
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Jeff Eastm
Our modules aren't working out as well as expected.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> Sean Owen wrote:
>
>> That last commit concerning the dirichlet code and models seems to
>> cause the build to fail -- or else I'm the victim of another
>> environment-specific issue.
>>
>>
Actually, I suppose it's not a big deal if core *tests* depend on
utils. I can make that adjustment if that sounds right.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Jeff Eastman
wrote:
> Sean Owen wrote:
>>
>> That last commit concerning the dirichlet code and models seems to
>> cause the build to fail --
Sean Owen wrote:
That last commit concerning the dirichlet code and models seems to
cause the build to fail -- or else I'm the victim of another
environment-specific issue.
I note it only because the fix raises a question. It causes core/ to
depend utils/, and I had thought that was not the idea
10 matches
Mail list logo
