Re: Multi-relational data

Thank you all for the pointers. This is a subject that I'll probably have to explore in a few weeks, and your guys help is much appreciated. I'll keep in touch if something interesting comes from this work. Cheers, Pedro On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > We already support

Re: Multi-relational data

We already support sparse vectors and matrices. That should be pretty much all you need. There is emerging support for SVM and on-line logistic regression. A little less mature is support for very large scale SVD which would give you a reasonable basis for clustering, or categorization. On Wed,

Re: Multi-relational data

Hi Pedro, Representing data points as semi-structured entities (and then doing clustering, classification, or content-based recommendation) is certainly something on the horizon for Mahout (see MAHOUT-274for the start of the thinking around repre

Re: Multi-relational data

Hi, On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > You might have to be more specific. Support this is in the context of > what, recommendations, clustering, ? > Classification, clustering, and recommendation are the most important ones. > > You can probably fit such concepts into any fra

Re: Multi-relational data

You might have to be more specific. Support this is in the context of what, recommendations, clustering, ? You can probably fit such concepts into any framework with enough cleverness, so in that sense, as a general framework, sure I don't see why any algorithm couldn't eventually be applied to su