Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

2003-01-16 Thread Matthew Davis
* Barry A. Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > 1. Do nothing, everything's fine just the way it is -1 > 2. Do a + b +1 > 3. Do a + b + c 0 -- | Matthew Davis /\ http://dogpound.vnet.net/ | || | Thursday,

Re: [Mailman-Developers] mm2.1 - DEFAULT_PLAIN_DIGEST_KEEP_HEADERS

2003-01-16 Thread Bryan Fullerton
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 07:24 PM, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: Please try this patch. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/ index.php?func=detail&aid=668819&group_id=103&atid=300103 This looks good. I've applied it - will let you know how digests look when they go out (midnight). Thanks! Bry

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

2003-01-16 Thread Dan Mick
Barry A. Warsaw wrote: a. I create a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list b. Send SF tracker messages to this list instead of mailman-developers c. Possibly (and I think optimally), retire mailman-checkins and send the cvs diffs to mailman-coders as well. Personally, I don't see the need for two diffe

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

2003-01-16 Thread Terri Oda
> 1. Do nothing, everything's fine just the way it is 0 > 2. Do a + b +1 > 3. Do a + b + c 0 4. do a + b + post summaries to mailman-developers +1 I don't mind getting the SF messages, even on those "my poor laptop's on dialup" days, but to be honest, they get procmailed to another folder and I

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

2003-01-16 Thread Marilyn Davis
> 1. Do nothing, everything's fine just the way it is +0 > 2. Do a + b +1 > 3. Do a + b + c +1 Gee, eVote could help here. I'm dawdling with the install process and documentation, but soon. On an eVoted list, for this poll, you'd send a message to the list address that says: eVote poll pu

[Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filter

2003-01-16 Thread Matthew Davis
Quoting Kory Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I would like to discard any email that comes from the from address > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I know you can put a filter value in the mm_cfg.py and > that will filter mail to be held for moderation; for example, "from: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]", but I would r

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669296 ] rmlist and held messages

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669296, was opened at 2003-01-16 22:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669296&group_id=103 Category: command line scripts Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 2 Submitted By: Peer Heinlein (pheinlein) Assi

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669200 ] need ability to block mail from a specific machine

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669200, was opened at 2003-01-16 13:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669200&group_id=103 Category: security/privacy Group: 2.1 (stable) >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jared mauch (jaredmauch) Assign

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669200 ] need ability to block mail from a specific machine

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669200, was opened at 2003-01-16 19:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669200&group_id=103 Category: security/privacy Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jared mauch (jaredmauch) Assigned

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669201 ] feature: unified membership allow post list.

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669201, was opened at 2003-01-16 13:22 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669201&group_id=103 Category: security/privacy Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jared mauch (jaredmauch) Assigned

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669200 ] need ability to block mail from a specific machine

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669200, was opened at 2003-01-16 13:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669200&group_id=103 Category: security/privacy Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jared mauch (jaredmauch) Assigned

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669197 ] lock timeouts need to be reported

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669197, was opened at 2003-01-16 13:16 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669197&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jared mauch (jaredmauch) Assigned to: Nobod

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669081 ] Major attachment handling bug!

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669081, was opened at 2003-01-16 15:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669081&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 9 Submitted By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon) >Assigned to: B

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-660675 ] special characters in realnames

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #660675, was opened at 2003-01-01 15:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=660675&group_id=103 Category: None Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 8 Submitted By: Peer Heinlein (pheinlein) Assigned to: Nobody

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669111 ] Tiny mistake on the remove a list webpage

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669111, was opened at 2003-01-16 15:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669111&group_id=103 Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Szilard Vizi (szilardv) Assigned to: Nobody

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669081 ] Major attachment handling bug!

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669081, was opened at 2003-01-16 15:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669081&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon) Assigned to: Nob

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Patches-644810 ] Sendmail mailer inPython

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #644810, was opened at 2002-11-27 16:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=644810&group_id=103 Category: mail delivery Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Barrett (ppsys) Assigned to

[Mailman-Developers] spam filter

2003-01-16 Thread Kory Wheatley
Hi, I would like to discard any email that comes from the from address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I know you can put a filter value in the mm_cfg.py and that will filter mail to be held for moderation; for example, "from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]", but I would rather have it be automatically discarded, so th

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669081 ] Major attachment handling bug!

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669081, was opened at 2003-01-16 15:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669081&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon) Assigned to: Nob

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669081 ] Major attachment handling bug!

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669081, was opened at 2003-01-16 15:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669081&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon) Assigned to: Nob

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669081 ] Major attachment handling bug!

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669081, was opened at 2003-01-16 09:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669081&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon) Assigned to: Nob

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

2003-01-16 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BF" == Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BF> I don't entirely understand this -1/0/+1 thing, but option 3 BF> would be my preference. http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0010.html -Barry ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Bugs-669081 ] Major attachment handling bug!

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #669081, was opened at 2003-01-16 15:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=669081&group_id=103 Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon) Assigned to: Nob

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful

2003-01-16 Thread Bryan Fullerton
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 12:12 AM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: 3. Do a + b + c I don't entirely understand this -1/0/+1 thing, but option 3 would be my preference. Bryan ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python

[Mailman-Developers] [ mailman-Feature Requests-669056 ] Archive URL in Email

2003-01-16 Thread SourceForge.net
Feature Requests item #669056, was opened at 2003-01-16 06:12 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=669056&group_id=103 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Grant Bowman (grantbow) Assigned to: Nobod

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications consideredharmful

2003-01-16 Thread John A. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw > "Re: [Mailman-Developers] Sourceforge notifications considered harmful" > Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:12:07 -0500 BAW> So vote by the -1/0/+1 rules against these options: BAW> 1. Do nothing, everything's fine